Literature DB >> 7868684

Timing of development is a critical parameter for predicting successful embryogenesis.

S H McKiernan1, B D Bavister.   

Abstract

Development of embryos from the 1-cell stage into blastocysts in vitro is generally slower than the time-course for development in vivo. It was the objective of this work to determine whether embryos that reach the 8-cell stage within a normal time-frame have a developmental advantage (both in vitro and post-embryo transfer) over slower embryos. Hamster 1-cell embryos were collected 10 h post-egg activation (PEA) and cultured for 48 h (58 h PEA = t50 for 8-cell embryo development in vivo) in hamster embryo culture medium-6. Embryos were sorted according to stage reached, culture was continued in fresh medium and stage of development was observed at 78, 82 and 86 h PEA. At 58 h PEA, embryos were < 4-cell (4%), 4-cell (19%), 5- to 7-cell (16%) or 8-cell (61%). The 58 h 8-cell embryos had a significantly greater ability to develop to the blastocyst stage than 58 h 4-cell embryos at 78, 82 and 86 h PEA (74 versus 13%, 69 versus 25% and 65 versus 37% respectively). The percentages of 14-day-old fetuses collected after embryo transfer indicated that morulae and blastocysts derived from 58 h 4-cell embryos were, on average, less viable (26% fetuses) than morulae and blastocysts from 58 h 8-cell embryos (51% fetuses). Thus morulae and blastocysts developing in vitro from faster or slower cleaving embryos can be qualitatively as well as quantitatively different. These data indicate that the timing of development in vitro, specifically the timing of completion of the third cell cycle, is a critically important parameter for predicting successful embryogenesis in the hamster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7868684     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  13 in total

1.  The influence of prefreeze growth rate and blastomere number on cryosurvival and subsequent implantation of human embryos.

Authors:  D H Edgar; H Jericho; H Bourne; J C McBain
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Mitochondrial distribution and microtubule organization in fertilized and cloned porcine embryos: implications for developmental potential.

Authors:  Mika Katayama; Zhisheng Zhong; Liangxue Lai; Peter Sutovsky; Randall S Prather; Heide Schatten
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Equivalency of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryonic stem cells derived from fertilized, parthenogenetic, and hand-made cloned embryos.

Authors:  Musharifa Muzaffar; Naresh L Selokar; Karn P Singh; Mohammad Zandi; Manoj K Singh; Riaz A Shah; Manmohan S Chauhan; Suresh K Singla; Prabhat Palta; Radheysham Manik
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 1.987

4.  Clinical experience with synthetic serum substitute as a protein supplement in IVF culture media: a retrospective study.

Authors:  N N Desai; L A Sheean; D Martin; V Gindlesperger; C M Austin; H Lisbonna; B Peskin; J M Goldfarb
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Nonessential amino acids and glutamine decrease the time of the first three cleavage divisions and increase compaction of mouse zygotes in vitro.

Authors:  M Lane; D K Gardner
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Relationship between development, metabolism, and mitochondrial organization in 2-cell hamster embryos in the presence of low levels of phosphate.

Authors:  T E Ludwig; J M Squirrell; A C Palmenberg; B D Bavister
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Prospective randomized comparison of two embryo culture systems: P1 medium by Irvine Scientific and the Cook IVF Medium.

Authors:  Dalit Ben-Yosef; Ami Amit; Foad Azem; Tamar Schwartz; Tania Cohen; Nava Mei-Raz; Ariela Carmon; Joseph B Lessing; Yuval Yaron
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Human embryo viability: what determines developmental potential, and can it be assessed?

Authors:  D K Gardner; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Efficacy of two sperm preparation techniques in reducing non-specific bacterial species from human semen.

Authors:  Prabath K Abeysundara; Dmab Dissanayake; Prasantha S Wijesinghe; Rrdp Perera; Aan Nishad
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-04

10.  Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress.

Authors:  H S Wolff; J R Fredrickson; D L Walker; D E Morbeck
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.