Literature DB >> 7867115

Anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery supplemented with subarachnoid bupivacaine and morphine: a report of 18 cases.

R J Kowalewski1, C L MacAdams, C J Eagle, D P Archer, B Bharadwaj.   

Abstract

We report our experience with general anaesthesia (GA) supplemented with subarachnoid bupivacaine and morphine for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in 18 patients. Fifteen patients were male, and mean age was 62 yr. Anaesthesia (GA) was induced with alfentanil 97 +/- 22 micrograms.kg-1 and midazolam 0.04 +/- 0.02 mg.kg-1 supplemented with a muscle relaxant, and maintained with isoflurane (0.25-0.5%) in oxygen throughout surgery. Spinal anaesthesia (SA) was then performed at a lumber level using hyperbaric bupivacaine (23-30 mg) and/or lidocaine (150 mg) with morphine (0.5-1 mg). Pooled data showed the following haemodynamic results (P < 0.05). Induction of GA produced a decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Addition of SA produced a decrease in heart rate. Heart rate and MAP did not change with sternotomy. Phenylephrine support of arterial blood pressure was used at some time during operation in 17 patients. Supplementation of GA was minimal. Patients received 2.7 +/- 0.7 coronary grafts. Operating room time was 3.9 +/- 0.6 hr. Postoperative analgesic requirements were minimal, and in half of the patients tracheal extubation occurred on the day of surgery. Complications included one myocardial infarction, one resternotomy, a metabolic encephalopathy in a dialysis-dependent patient, and one case of herpes labialis. No patient recalled intraoperative events. Combined GA with SA may be an effective technique for CABG surgery. Further study of the cardiovascular, neurological and metabolic effects of the technique is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7867115     DOI: 10.1007/BF03020660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  31 in total

1.  Coronary artery bypass grafting using two different anesthetic techniques: Part 3: Adrenergic responses.

Authors:  T H Liem; L H Booij; M J Gielen; M A Hasenbos; J van Egmond
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Combined epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  J F Baron; M Bertrand; E Barré; G Godet; O Mundler; P Coriat; P Viars
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Hemodynamic changes prior to and after sternotomy in patients anesthetized with high-dose fentanyl.

Authors:  R R Edde
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Spinal subarachnoid hematoma: a hazard of lumbar puncture resulting in reversible paraplegia.

Authors:  S S Brem; D A Hafler; R L Van Uitert; R L Ruff; W H Reichert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Thoracic epidural anesthesia and central hemodynamics in patients with unstable angina pectoris.

Authors:  S Blomberg; H Emanuelsson; S E Ricksten
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Intrathecal morphine in the management of pain following cardiac surgery. A comparison with morphine i.v.

Authors:  G J Fitzpatrick; D C Moriarty
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after thoracotomy.

Authors:  T E Salomäki; J O Laitinen; L S Nuutinen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Coronary artery bypass grafting using two different anesthetic techniques: Part 2: Postoperative outcome.

Authors:  T H Liem; M A Hasenbos; L H Booij; M J Gielen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia for the control of pain in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  P Toft; A Jorgensen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Haemodynamic stability with midazolam-sufentanil analgesia in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  S M Raza; R W Masters; A R Vasireddy; E K Zsigmond
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  5 in total

1.  A combination of low dose spinal and general anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Gurmarnik; M Poreda; G M Reid; J T Frasca; R Paul-Blanc
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  CABS and CSEGA ...

Authors:  J Eldor
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Combined technique for cardiac anaesthesia.

Authors:  F E Ralley
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Neuraxial anesthesia for cardiac surgery: thoracic epidural and high spinal anesthesia - why is it different?

Authors:  R Kowalewski; D Seal; T Tang; C Prusinkiewicz; D Ha
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2011

5.  High Spinal Anesthesia Enhances Anti-Inflammatory Responses in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Aortic Valve Replacement: Randomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Trevor W R Lee; Stephen Kowalski; Kelsey Falk; Doug Maguire; Darren H Freed; Kent T HayGlass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.