Literature DB >> 7866836

Spinal bone mineral density changes following halo vest immobilization for cervical trauma.

P Korovessis1, D Konstantinou, G Piperos, M Partheni, F Tzorztidis, N Papadakis.   

Abstract

In this prospective study we followed the bone mineral density (BMD) changes of the injured cervical spine immobilized with the halo vest. In order to define the natural history of cancellous vertebral bone loss and restoration, dual-energy densitometry was used on each of ten selected cervical spines in the lateral view (1) immediately after the application of the device, (2) at the end of the treatment and (3) 3 months after the removal of the halo vest. The halo vest produces local osteoporosis in the immobilized cervical spine with an overall reduction of BMD averaging 2.83% (P < 0.05). The response of the cervical spine to immobilization was only slightly different from patient to patient and between different vertebral bodies in each particular spine. The type and the level of injury of the cervical spine were not related to the changes of BMD, age or gender of the patient, whereas the local osteoporosis was mostly reversible in the follow-up evaluation of 5-6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7866836     DOI: 10.1007/bf02221593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Spinal bone density following spinal fusion.

Authors:  H J Lipscomb; S A Grubb; R V Talmage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  A chondral modeling theory.

Authors:  H M Frost
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1979-11-06       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  A new halo-vest: rationale, design and biomechanical comparison to standard halo-vest designs.

Authors:  M H Krag; B D Beynnon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The halo. A spinal skeletal traction fixation device.

Authors:  V L Nickel; J Perry; A Garrett; M Heppenstall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Failure of immobilization of the cervical spine by the halo vest. A report of five cases.

Authors:  R Whitehill; J A Richman; J A Glaser
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Cervical orthoses. A study comparing their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects.

Authors:  R M Johnson; D L Hart; E F Simmons; G R Ramsby; W O Southwick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Physiological responses to prolonged bed rest and fluid immersion in humans.

Authors:  J E Greenleaf
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-09

8.  Complications associated with the halo-vest. A review of 245 cases.

Authors:  J A Glaser; R Whitehill; W G Stamp; J A Jane
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Halo-vest treatment of unstable traumatic cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  B Lind; H Sihlbom; A Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Forces and motions across the neck in patients treated with halo-vest.

Authors:  B Lind; H Sihlbom; A Nordwall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changsheng Yang; Huafeng Wang; Zhaomin Zheng; Zhongmin Zhang; Jianru Wang; Hui Liu; Yongjung Jay Kim; Samuel Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.