Literature DB >> 7866216

Withholding consent to lifesaving treatment: three cases.

A Elton1, P Honig, A Bentovim, J Simons.   

Abstract

The refusal of children or their parents to consent to treatment that professionals regard as essential always results in a dilemma. Responding to such refusals demands careful and sensitive clinical and thicolegal intervention and close cooperation among professionals, in particular doctors and social workers. Since the introduction of the Children Act 1989 the number of cases in which children have withheld consent to lifesaving treatment has risen, and it is now increasingly recognised that children have a right to have their views legally represented if a local authority or health authority seeks a court's leave to carry out treatment. Professionals have to consider which legal route, under either the Children Act or the Mental Health Act, is likely to be best for the individual child.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children Act 1989 (Great Britain); Legal Approach; Mental Health Act 1983 (Great Britain); Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7866216      PMCID: PMC2548765          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.310.6976.373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  1 in total

1.  Can children withhold consent to treatment?

Authors:  J A Devereux; D P Jones; D L Dickenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29
  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Guarding paediatricians against allegations of assault.

Authors:  T L Chambers; G P Panting
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Etiology, ethics, and outcomes of chronic kidney disease in neonates.

Authors:  Jameela A Kari; Sara N Sharief; Sherif M El Desoky; Khalid A Alhasan; Amr S Albanna
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.484

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.