Literature DB >> 7865520

Recovery of major organ function in patients awaiting heart transplantation with Thoratec ventricular assist devices. Thoratec Ventricular Assist Device Principal Investigators.

D J Farrar1, J D Hill.   

Abstract

The time course of recovery of hepatic and renal function was determined in 193 patients receiving Thoratec ventricular assist devices while awaiting transplantation at 41 hospitals in eight countries. The duration of circulatory support averaged 26 days (maximum 248 days) and the average ventricular assist device blood flow index was 2.7 +/- 0.5 L/min/m2 compared with a preoperative cardiac index of 1.4 +/- 0.7 L/min/m2. Renal and hepatic function improved in most patients in 1 to 3 weeks of support. When comparing patients with the longest durations on the ventricular assist device (60 to 248 days) to patients with the shortest durations (< 7 days), laboratory values were significantly improved: creatinine (-29%, from 1.7 +/- 1.2 to 1.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dl), blood urea nitrogen (-32%, from 37 +/- 27 to 25 +/- 14 mg/dl), serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (-81%, from 397 +/- 702 to 76 +/- 45 IU) and total bilirubin (-79%, from 7.0 +/- 8.6 to 1.5 +/- 0.7 mg/dl). However, the posttransplantation survival through hospital discharge was not significantly different: 88% (14 of 16) for patients supported for at least 60 days and 86% (43 of 50) for patients who underwent transplantation after only 1 week of support. Therefore renal and hepatic function improve during ventricular assist device support, but the survival rate after transplantation is not related to duration and is comparable to that of conventional heart transplantation for short or long periods of ventricular assist support. Although it is clearly important not to proceed to transplantation in patients with irreversible organ failure who have ventricular assist devices, these data suggest that as long as the patient is on the path to recovery, the outcome is basically the same as for patients who have full recovery of renal and hepatic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7865520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  6 in total

Review 1.  Kidney dysfunction and left ventricular assist device support: a comprehensive perioperative review.

Authors:  Samuel T Coffin; Dia R Waguespack; Nicholas A Haglund; Simon Maltais; Jamie P Dwyer; Mary E Keebler
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 2.  Left ventricular assist devices and other devices for end-stage heart failure: utility of echocardiography.

Authors:  James N Kirkpatrick; Susan E Wiegers; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Ventricular assist devices as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. A prelude to destination therapy.

Authors:  W L Holman; R C Bourge; R D Spruell; C P Murrah; D C McGiffin; J K Kirklin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  An approach to the treatment of pediatric myocarditis.

Authors:  Daniel Levi; Juan Alejos
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  The mid-term effect of left ventricular assist devices on renal functions.

Authors:  Mustafa Emre Gürcü; Özge Altaş Yerlikhan; Tanıl Özer; Atakan Erkılınç; Ece Altınay; Esin Erdem; Murat Gücün; Nural Bekiroğlu; Kaan Kırali
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 0.332

6.  Ventricular assist devices in pediatrics.

Authors:  A Fuchs; H Netz
Journal:  Images Paediatr Cardiol       Date:  2001-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.