Literature DB >> 7864466

Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.

P W Major1, D E Johnson, K L Hesse, K E Glover.   

Abstract

This study was designed to quantify the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of 52 commonly used posterior anterior cephalometric landmarks. The horizontal and vertical identification errors were determined for a sample of 33 skulls and 25 patients. The results show that there is a considerable range in the magnitude of error with different horizontal and vertical values. Interexaminer landmark identification error was significantly larger than intraexaminer error for many landmarks. The identification error was different for the skull sample compared to the patient sample for a number of landmarks. The relevance of knowing the identification error for each landmark being considered in a particular application was discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7864466     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0447:LIEIPA>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  25 in total

1.  Reproducibility and speed of landmarking process in cephalometric analysis using two input devices: mouse-driven cursor versus pen.

Authors:  Alice Cutrera; Ersilia Barbato; Francesco Maiorana; Daniela Giordano; Rosalia Leonardi
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2015-07-28

2.  Effects of head positioning on cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  M Berneburg; B Koos; R Kratochwil; A Godt
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Establishment of reference mandibular plane for anterior alveolar morphology evaluation using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Rong-yang Wang; Min Han; Hong Liu; Chun-ling Wang; Hong-hong Xian; Lei Zhang; Shi-jie Zhang; Dong-xu Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Cone beam computed tomography analysis of dentoalveolar changes immediately after maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Carin Elizabeth Domann; Chung How Kau; Jeryl D English; James J Xia; Nada M Souccar; Robert P Lee
Journal:  Orthodontics (Chic.)       Date:  2011

5.  Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.

Authors:  Abbas Shokri; Amirfarhang Miresmaeili; Nasrin Farhadian; Sepideh Falah-Kooshki; Payam Amini; Najmeh Mollaie
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.

Authors:  Adrienn Dobai; Zsolt Markella; Tamás Vízkelety; Christian Fouquet; Adrienne Rosta; József Barabás
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Multiobjective optimization framework for landmark measurement error correction in three-dimensional cephalometric tomography.

Authors:  A DeCesare; M Secanell; M O Lagravère; J Carey
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  The relation between idiopathic scoliosis and the frontal and lateral facial form.

Authors:  Tae-Hwan Kim; Joo-Hwan Kim; Yae-Jin Kim; Il-Sik Cho; Yong-Kyu Lim; Dong-Yul Lee
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional cephalometric evaluations of children with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Ozlem Tulunoglu; Elcin Esenlik; Ayse Gulsen; Ibrahim Tulunoglu
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-08

10.  Comparison of transverse analysis between posteroanterior cephalogram and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Kyung-Min Lee; Hyeon-Shik Hwang; Jin-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.