Literature DB >> 7864464

Posttreatment changes in different facial types.

A R Zaher1, S E Bishara, J R Jakobsen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the changes occurring during and after orthodontic treatment in three facial types: short, average and long. Sixty-six subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion were evaluated. All cases were treated nonextraction, using a fixed edgewise appliance and extraoral forces. The lateral cephalogram and dental casts for each patient were measured at three different stages: pretreatment, immediately after appliance removal and at least two years posttreatment. There was a wide range of individual variation in posttreatment change for the various skeletal and dental parameters measured. With few exceptions, the three facial types did not show significant differences in posttreatment change. The relative protrusion of maxillary incisor tip (U1:A-Pog) tended to increase after treatment in the long face type while it tended to decrease in the short face type. Long face females, when compared with all other groups, showed greater posttreatment incremental increase in anterior face height as well as the greatest posttreatment decrease in maxillary arch length. Males expressed greater posttreatment incremental increases in the various linear measurements of face height than females. Differences in posttreatment change for the different facial types do not require special retention consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7864464     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0425:PCIDFT>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  5 in total

1.  Nonsurgical orthodontic treatment of a hypodivergent adult patient with bilateral posterior scissors bite and excessive overjet.

Authors:  Masahiro Nakamura; Noriaki Kawanabe; Rie Adachi; Takashi Yamashiro; Hiroshi Kamioka
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Lower incisor inclination changes during Xbow treatment according to vertical facial type.

Authors:  Carlos Flores-Mir; Arden Young; Amira Greiss; Matthew Woynorowski; James Peng
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Facial divergence and mandibular crowding in treated subjects.

Authors:  Avrum I Goldberg; R G Behrents; Donald R Oliver; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types.

Authors:  Rajat Mangla; Navjot Singh; Vinay Dua; Prajeesh Padmanabhan; Mannu Khanna
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2011-07

5.  To Evaluate the Correlation Between Skeletal and Dental Parameters to the Amount of Crowding in Class II Div. 1 Malocclusions.

Authors:  Shivani Singh; G Shivaprakash
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.