Literature DB >> 7864062

Cranial variables as predictors of hominine body mass.

L C Aiello1, B A Wood.   

Abstract

Body mass is a key variable in investigating the evolutionary biology of the hominines (Australopithecus, Paranthropus, and Homo). It is not only closely related to life-history parameters but also provides a necessary baseline for studies of encephalization or megadonty. Body mass estimates are normally based on the postcranial skeleton. However, the majority of hominid fossils are cranio-dental remains that are unassociated with post-cranial material. Only rarely can postcranial material be linked with cranio-dentally defined hominid taxa. This study responds to this problem by evaluating body mass estimates based on 15 cranial variables to determine whether they compare in reliability with estimates determined from postcranial variables. Results establish that some cranial variables, and particularly orbital area, orbital height, and biporionic breadth, are nearly as good mass predictors for hominoids as are some of the best postcranial predictors. For the hominines in particular, orbital height is the cranial variable which produces body mass estimates that are most in line with postcranially generated estimates. Both orbital area and biporionic breadth scale differently in the hominines than they do in the other hominoids. This difference in scaling results in unusually large estimates of body mass based on these variables for the larger-sized hominines, although the three cranial variables produce equivalent predicted masses for the smaller-bodied hominines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7864062     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330950405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  12 in total

1.  Face shape differs in phylogenetically related populations.

Authors:  Saskia M J Hopman; Johannes H M Merks; Michael Suttie; Raoul C M Hennekam; Peter Hammond
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology.

Authors:  B Wood; B G Richmond
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Paleoclimatic Variation and Brain Expansion during Human Evolution.

Authors:  Jessica Ash; Gordon G Gallup
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-08-09

4.  Body size, body proportions, and encephalization in a Middle Pleistocene archaic human from northern China.

Authors:  Karen R Rosenberg; Lü Zuné; Christopher B Ruff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How reliable are human phylogenetic hypotheses?

Authors:  M Collard; B Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The craniomandibular mechanics of being human.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; Toni L Ferrara; Colin R McHenry; Darren Curnoe; Uphar Chamoli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Occipital condyle width (OCW) is a highly accurate predictor of body mass in therian mammals.

Authors:  Russell K Engelman
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 8.  Hominin life history: reconstruction and evolution.

Authors:  Shannen L Robson; Bernard Wood
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Intraspecific Variation in Maximum Ingested Food Size and Body Mass in Varecia rubra and Propithecus coquereli.

Authors:  Adam Hartstone-Rose; Jonathan M G Perry
Journal:  Anat Res Int       Date:  2011-05-17

10.  Facial orientation and facial shape in extant great apes: a geometric morphometric analysis of covariation.

Authors:  Dimitri Neaux; Franck Guy; Emmanuel Gilissen; Walter Coudyzer; Patrick Vignaud; Stéphane Ducrocq
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.