Literature DB >> 7863948

MR of mandibular invasion in patients with oral and oropharyngeal malignant neoplasms.

T S Chung1, D M Yousem, H M Seigerman, B N Schlakman, G S Weinstein, R E Hayden.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether MR imaging is an accurate means of assessing mandibular invasion in patients with carcinoma.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied the MR scans of 22 patients with pathologic or surgical confirmation of mandibular invasion from oral and oropharyngeal cancers. The MR images were blindly analyzed using primary criteria of: (a) cortical breakdown, (b) replacement of bone marrow fat, or (c) gadopentetate dimeglumine enhancement of a mass at the bone marrow defect. Secondary criteria of: (a) contiguous soft-tissue mass, and (b) mass on both sides of the mandibular cortex were also examined. Mandibular invasion was graded as periosteal/cortical, medullary, or no invasion.
RESULTS: Primary positive findings of cortical breakdown and abnormal bone marrow signal were highly sensitive (100%) for periosteal/cortical invasion and medullary involvement, respectively. However, a high rate of false-positive studies hampered the MR accuracy, which fell into the 73% to 77% range. A negative MR study was highly predictive, but a positive study was less valuable. Gadolinium enhancement added little to the MR study's accuracy. False-positive studies mainly occurred in the setting of prior irradiation, osteoradionecrosis, and odontogenic infections.
CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging is a sensitive method for detecting mandibular invasion but has a low positive predictive value. A negative study virtually excludes cortical/periosteal or bone marrow invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7863948      PMCID: PMC8334282     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  5 in total

Review 1.  Resectability issues with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  D M Yousem; K Gad; R P Tufano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  A potential pitfall of MR imaging for assessing mandibular invasion of squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity.

Authors:  A Imaizumi; N Yoshino; I Yamada; K Nagumo; T Amagasa; K Omura; N Okada; T Kurabayashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Impact of nonhybrid 99mTc-MDP-SPECT/CT image fusion in diagnostic and treatment of oromaxillofacial malignancies.

Authors:  Denys John Loeffelbein; Eckhart Mielke; Andreas Konrad Buck; Marco Rainer Kesting; Frank Hölzle; Thomas Mücke; Steffen Müller; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of mandibular involvement from head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chunjie Li; Wenbin Yang; Yi Men; Fanglong Wu; Jian Pan; Longjiang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 1 (Head and Neck Surgery).

Authors:  Pavel Dulguerov; Martina A Broglie; Guido Henke; Marco Siano; Paul Martin Putora; Christian Simon; Daniel Zwahlen; Gerhard F Huber; Giorgio Ballerini; Lorenza Beffa; Roland Giger; Sacha Rothschild; Sandro V Negri; Olgun Elicin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.