Opposite functions for two classes of genes of the human carcinoembryonic antigen family.

The human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family can be divided into two subgroups according to the means of anchorage of member glycoproteins to the cell membrane: glycophosphatidyl inositol (GPI) linkage and transmembrane linkage. The GPI-linked members tend to be up-regulated in human tumours, whereas the transmembrane-linked members tend to be down-regulated. Thus the question as to whether the GPI members could be formally considered to function as oncogenes and the transmembrane members as tumour suppressors deserves consideration. Members of both subgroups function in vitro as intercellular adhesion molecules, but the characteristics of this adhesion, including temperature and divalent-cation dependence, differ markedly between the groups. Even the mechanism of intermolecular adhesion appears to differ fundamentally in that GPI-linked CEA-CEA binding involves a double reciprocal bonding between two domains, whereas transmembrane-linked biliary glycoprotein (BGP)-BGP binding requires only one domain. Finally, the ectopic expression of CEA in myoblasts can block myogenic differentiation leaving the cells with the ability to divide, while expression of BGP does not affect or may even accelerate myogenic differentiation. These differences in phenotypic effects in vitro thus mirror the differences observed in expression in tumours and support the view that the GPI and transmembrane groups have opposite effects on cells in relation to the malignant phenotype.