Literature DB >> 7862897

Crossmodal divided attention in rats: effects of chlordiazepoxide and scopolamine.

J McGaughy1, J Turchi, M Sarter.   

Abstract

"Divided attention" is a psychological construct that hinges on assumptions about a fixed finite capacity of subjects to simultaneously process multiple sets of information. A model of a crossmodal divided attention task was developed in rats. Initially, rats were trained consecutively in operant auditory and visual conditional discrimination tasks. The final task consisted of two successive blocks of 20 trials per modality (modality certainty), followed by 60 trials comprising a semi-randomized sequence of stimuli of both modalities (auditory or visual) and qualities (flashing/pulsing or constantly turned on; modality uncertainty). In comparison to unimodal blocks of trials, performance in the mixed condition was assumed to reflect the demands on the parallel processing of two sets of stimulus-response rules. While response accuracy remained unchanged, response latencies were generally longer in the bimodal condition. Administration of scopolamine (0.03, 0.06, 0.1 mg/kg) or chlordiazepoxide (1, 3, 5, 8 mg/kg) dose-dependently increased response latencies. The scopolamine-induced increase in response latencies was greater in the mixed condition. Cost-benefit analyses demonstrated that the absolute divided attention costs (in ms) were generally higher for visual than for auditory stimuli. Both drugs produced qualitatively similar effects; however, scopolamine was more potent in increasing the absolute divided attention costs than chlordiazepoxide. These data are discussed in terms of the validity of this animal paradigm, and of hypotheses about the effects of benzodiazepine receptor agonists and muscarinic antagonists on brain information processing capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7862897     DOI: 10.1007/bf02244774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  24 in total

Review 1.  Central versus peripheral effects of muscarinic antagonists: the limitations of quaternary ammonium derivatives.

Authors:  H Moore; P Dudchenko; K S Comer; J P Bruno; M Sarter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Attention.

Authors:  R A Kinchla
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  GABAergic control of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons and memory.

Authors:  P Dudchenko; M Sarter
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1991-01-31       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. I. Simple and choice reaction tasks.

Authors:  J Hohnsbein; M Falkenstein; J Hoormann; L Blanke
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-06

5.  Scopolamine and the control of attention in humans.

Authors:  M P Dunne; L R Hartley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and diazepam on working memory.

Authors:  J M Rusted; P Eaton-Williams; D M Warburton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Divided attention, as measured by dichotic speech performance, in dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Authors:  C L Grady; A M Grimes; N Patronas; T Sunderland; N L Foster; S I Rapoport
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1989-03

8.  The effects of excitotoxic lesions of the substantia innominata, ventral and dorsal globus pallidus on the acquisition and retention of a conditional visual discrimination: implications for cholinergic hypotheses of learning and memory.

Authors:  B J Everitt; T W Robbins; J L Evenden; H M Marston; G H Jones; T E Sirkiä
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance.

Authors:  Joan M McDowd; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Models of memory dysfunction? A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and lorazepam on memory, psychomotor performance and mood.

Authors:  H V Curran; F Schifano; M Lader
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  14 in total

1.  Ensemble recordings in awake rats: achieving behavioral regularity during multimodal stimulus processing and discriminative learning.

Authors:  Eunjeong Lee; Ana I Oliveira-Ferreira; Ed de Water; Hans Gerritsen; Mattijs C Bakker; Jan A W Kalwij; Tjerk van Goudoever; Wietze H Buster; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Toxicogenomic studies of the rat brain at an early time point following acute sarin exposure.

Authors:  Tirupapuliyur V Damodaran; Stephen T Greenfield; Anand G Patel; Holly K Dressman; Siomon K Lin; Mohamed B Abou-Donia
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Switch-task performance in rats is disturbed by 12 h of sleep deprivation but not by 12 h of sleep fragmentation.

Authors:  Cathalijn H C Leenaars; Ruud N J M A Joosten; Allard Zwart; Hans Sandberg; Emma Ruimschotel; Maaike A J Hanegraaf; Maurice Dematteis; Matthijs G P Feenstra; Eus J W van Someren
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Early differential elevation and persistence of phosphorylated cAMP-response element binding protein (p-CREB) in the central nervous system of hens treated with diisopropyl phosphorofluoridate, an OPIDN-causing compound.

Authors:  Tirupapuliyur V Damodaran; Ali A Abdel-Rahman; Hagir B Suliman; Mohamed B Abou-Donia
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Atomoxetine reverses attentional deficits produced by noradrenergic deafferentation of medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Lori A Newman; Jenna Darling; Jill McGaughy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Psychopharmacological approaches to modulating attention in the five-choice serial reaction time task: implications for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Y Chudasama; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Neuronal mechanisms of the attentional dysfunctions in senile dementia and schizophrenia: two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  M Sarter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Deterministic functions of cortical acetylcholine.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Cindy Lustig; William M Howe; Howard Gritton; Anne S Berry
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 9.  Leveraging the cortical cholinergic system to enhance attention.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  Sarin causes early differential alteration and persistent overexpression in mRNAs coding for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin genes in the central nervous system of rats.

Authors:  Tirupapuliyar V Damodaran; Magdalena A Bilska; Ali A Rahman; Mohamed B Abou-Doni
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.