Literature DB >> 7861879

Randomised controlled trial of routine individual feedback to improve rationality and reduce numbers of test requests.

R A Winkens1, P Pop, A M Bugter-Maessen, R P Grol, A D Kester, G H Beusmans, J A Knottnerus.   

Abstract

Feedback can be described as a way to provide information on doctors' performance to enable changes in future behaviour. Feedback is used with the aim of changing test-ordering behaviour. It can lead to reductions in test usage and cost savings. It is not sufficiently clear, however, whether feedback leads to more appropriate test use. Since 1985, the Diagnostic Coordinating Center Maastricht has been giving feedback on diagnostic tests as a routine health care activity to all family doctors in its region. Both quantity and quality of requests are discussed. In a randomised, controlled trial over 2.5 years, discussion of tests not included previously was added to the existing routine feedback. One group of family doctors (n = 39) received feedback on test-group A (electrocardiography, endoscopy, cervical smears, and allergy tests), the other (n = 40) on test-group B (radiographic and ultrasonographic tests). Thus, each group of doctors acted as a control group for the other. Changes in volume and rationality of requests were analysed. The number of requests decreased during the trial (p = 0.036). Request numbers decreased particularly for test-group A (p = 0.04). The proportion of requests that were non-rational decreased more in the intervention than in the control groups (p = 0.009). Rationality improved predominantly for test-group B (p = 0.043). Thus, routine feedback can change the quantity and quality of requests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7861879     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90588-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  18 in total

1.  Improving test ordering in primary care: the added value of a small-group quality improvement strategy compared with classic feedback only.

Authors:  Wim H J M Verstappen; Trudy van der Weijden; Willy I Dubois; Ivo Smeele; Jan Hermsen; Frans E S Tan; Richard P T M Grol
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Effects of routine individual feedback over nine years on general practitioners' requests for tests.

Authors:  R A Winkens; P Pop; R P Grol; A M Bugter-Maessen; A D Kester; G H Beusmans; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-24

3.  Improving doctors' prescribing behaviour through reflection on guidelines and prescription feedback: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  P Lagerløv; M Loeb; M Andrew; P Hjortdahl
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

4.  Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results.

Authors:  Paul H H Houben; Ron A G Winkens; Trudy van der Weijden; Renee C R M Vossen; André J M Naus; Richard P T M Grol
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Effect of an Individualized Audit and Feedback Intervention on Rates of Musculoskeletal Diagnostic Imaging Requests by Australian General Practitioners: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Denise A O'Connor; Paul Glasziou; Christopher G Maher; Kirsten J McCaffery; Dina Schram; Brigit Maguire; Robert Ma; Laurent Billot; Alexandra Gorelik; Adrian C Traeger; Loai Albarqouni; Juliet Checketts; Parima Vyas; Brett Clark; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 157.335

6.  Strategies to reduce the use of low-value medical tests in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Toshihiko Takada; Pauline Heus; Sander van Doorn; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Jan-Willem Weenink; Simone A van Dulmen; Lotty Hooft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Simon D French; Sally Green; Rachelle Buchbinder; Hayley Barnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

8.  The boiling frog syndrome: A radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  N Mohd Ramli; Y Faridah
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2010-10-01

9.  A cluster randomized controlled trial aimed at implementation of local quality improvement collaboratives to improve prescribing and test ordering performance of general practitioners: study protocol.

Authors:  Jasper Trietsch; Trudy van der Weijden; Wim Verstappen; Rob Janknegt; Paul Muijrers; Ron Winkens; Ben van Steenkiste; Richard Grol; Job Metsemakers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging?

Authors:  Amanda Hall; Helen Richmond; Andrea Pike; Rebecca Lawrence; Holly Etchegary; Michelle Swab; Jacqueline Y Thompson; Charlotte Albury; Jill Hayden; Andrea M Patey; James Matthews
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.