Literature DB >> 7861422

Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatment--moral implications of a thought experiment.

R Gillon.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Death and Euthanasia; Philosophical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 7861422      PMCID： PMC1376554          DOI： 10.1136/jme.20.4.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent? A reply to Sulmasy and Sugarman.

Authors:  John Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Hawkeye Pierce and the questionable relevance of medical etiquette to contemporary medical ethics and practice.

Authors:  J Sugarman
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1994

3.  Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent?

Authors:  D P Sulmasy; J Sugarman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.903
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  The difference between withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  G Melltorp; T Nilstun
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  A costly separation between withdrawing and withholding treatment in intensive care.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  A Morally Permissible Moral Mistake? Reinterpreting a Thought Experiment as Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Nathan Emmerich; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 1.352
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.