Literature DB >> 7861314

Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias.

D T Wegener1, R E Petty.   

Abstract

Unlike many models of bias correction, our flexible correction model posits that corrections occur when judges are motivated and able to adjust assessments of targets according to their naive theories of how the context affects judgments of the target(s). In the current research, people flexibly correct assessments of different targets within the same context according to the differing theories associated with the context-target pairs. In Study 1, shared theories of assimilation and contrast bias are identified. Corrections consistent with those theories are obtained in Studies 2 and 3. Study 4 shows that idiographic measures of theories of bias predict the direction and magnitude of corrections. Implications of this work for corrections of attributions and bias removal in general are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7861314     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  10 in total

1.  Affect as information in persuasion: a model of affect identification and discounting.

Authors:  Dolores Albarracín; G Tarcan Kumkale
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-03

2.  The role of defensive confidence in preference for proattitudinal information: how believing that one is strong can sometimes be a defensive weakness.

Authors:  Dolores Albarracín; Amy L Mitchell
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-12

3.  Evaluative Conditioning: The "How" Question.

Authors:  Christopher R Jones; Michael A Olson; Russell H Fazio
Journal:  Adv Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-01-01

4.  When the expectations from a message will not be realized: Naïve theories can eliminate expectation-congruent judgments via correction.

Authors:  Ian M Handley; Dolores Albarracín; Rick D Brown; Hong Li; Ece C Kumkale; G Tarcan Kumkale
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  Beliefs about expectations moderate the influence of expectations on pain perception.

Authors:  Ian M Handley; Stephanie L Fowler; Heather M Rasinski; Suzanne G Helfer; Andrew L Geers
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-03

6.  Reactance to Transgressors: Why Authorities Deliver Harsher Penalties When the Social Context Elicits Expectations of Leniency.

Authors:  Celia Moore; Lamar Pierce
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-09

7.  Weight stigma and eating behaviors on a college campus: Are students immune to stigma's effects?

Authors:  Alexandra Brewis; Stephanie Brennhofer; Irene van Woerden; Meg Bruening
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-10-29

8.  Tools for fairness: Increased structure in the selection process reduces discrimination.

Authors:  Sima Wolgast; Martin Bäckström; Fredrik Björklund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Contextual blending of ingroup/outgroup face stimuli and word valence: LPP modulation and convergence of measures.

Authors:  Esteban Hurtado; Andrés Haye; Ramiro González; Facundo Manes; Agustiń Ibáñez
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Balancing Fairness and Efficiency: The Impact of Identity-Blind and Identity-Conscious Accountability on Applicant Screening.

Authors:  William T Self; Gregory Mitchell; Barbara A Mellers; Philip E Tetlock; J Angus D Hildreth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.