Literature DB >> 7859454

Contraceptive outcomes among post-partum and post-abortal adolescents.

P D Blumenthal1, L E Wilson, R E Remsburg, V E Cullins, G R Huggins.   

Abstract

Between January 1992 and January 1993, there were 280 teens (ages 13-18) who either delivered a baby or terminated a pregnancy at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center. Of these, 92 chose to contracept with Norplant implants, and 188 chose another method including "no" method. In July 1993, telephone interviews were conducted with 37 of those who chose Norplant implants and 41 of the non-Norplant implants users. After 1 year, 47% of oral contraceptive (COC) users had discontinued the method compared to only 16% of Norplant implants users (P < 0.03). Reasons for discontinuation centered on side effects for both groups but with some COC and condom users, discontinuing use due to "forgetfulness" or failure (pregnancy). Among the COC group (which was the most common choice after Norplant implant), 25% of the adolescents had experienced a subsequent unplanned pregnancy compared to 0% of the Norplant implant group (P < 0.01). Norplant implants were clearly an acceptable and effective contraceptive for these post-partum and post-abortal teens, who articulated a high motivation to avoid a subsequent unplanned pregnancy. However, it is clearly not the only method teens will choose to use, and more attention must be paid to adequate counseling of those choosing another method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent Pregnancy; Adolescents; Adolescents, Female; Age Factors; Americas; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraception Termination; Contraceptive Implants; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage--women; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Fertility; Maryland; North America; Northern America; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Reproductive Behavior; Retrospective Studies; Studies; Technical Report; United States; Youth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7859454     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(94)90062-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  6 in total

1.  Evidence-based case review. Contraception for adolescents.

Authors:  C Davtyan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Studying the use of oral contraception: a review of measurement approaches.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Katharine O'Connell White; Nancy Reame; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Contraceptive development and better family planning.

Authors:  S J Segal
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1996

4.  Influence of depressed mood and psychological stress symptoms on perceived oral contraceptive side effects and discontinuation in young minority women.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Katharine O'Connell White; Vaughn I Rickert; Nancy Reame; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 5.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  A J Coukell; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

Authors:  Irving Sivin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.