Literature DB >> 7857896

A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement ex vivo through three types of pre-adjusted brackets when subjected to determined tip or torque values.

A P Sims1, N E Waters, D J Birnie.   

Abstract

Friction in fixed appliance systems has received considerable attention in recent literature, although that attributable to varying second order (tip) and third order (torque) adjustments in either the bracket or the archwire has not been fully investigated. The ex vivo study of 0.022 x 0.028-inch slot Minitwin, Activa, and Standard Straight Wire brackets investigates friction when known values of tip or torque were applied to 0.018 x 0.025-inch stainless steel wires. The resistance to sliding of the wire through the ligated brackets was measured on a vertically-mounted Instron testing machine. The results showed that the self-ligating Activa brackets consistently produced less friction than the other conventionally tied brackets. Minitwin brackets were slightly more resistant to movement than the Standard brackets during torquing, but the converse was found when tip was applied. Increasing tip and torque (ranges tested 0-6 degrees and 0-25 degrees, respectively) produced almost linear increases in friction for all brackets, although increasing tip had the more profound effect on friction, particularly in Activa brackets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7857896     DOI: 10.1179/bjo.21.4.367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Orthod        ISSN: 0301-228X


  8 in total

1.  Canine retraction rate with self-ligating brackets vs conventional edgewise brackets.

Authors:  S Jack Burrow
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Evaluation of the friction of self-ligating and conventional bracket systems.

Authors:  Simona Tecco; Donato Di Iorio; Riccardo Nucera; Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Giancarlo Cordasco; Felice Festa
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-07

3.  Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  M S Kannan; R V Murali; S Kishorekumar; K Gnanashanmugam; V Jayanth
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-04

4.  Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Ferdinand M Machibya; Xingfu Bao; Lihua Zhao; Min Hu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Friction forces during sliding of various brackets for malaligned teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Vito Crincoli; Letizia Perillo; Maria Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Antonio Balsamo; Vitaliano Serpico; Francesco Chiatante; Carmine Pappalettere; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-28

6.  Frictional resistance of three types of ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Claire L Williams; Khaled Khalaf
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2014-01-01

7.  A comparative in-vivo evaluation of the alignment efficiency of 5 ligation methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy; Talapaneni Ashok Kumar; Mandava Prasad; Sivakumar Nuvvula; Rajedra Goud Patil; Praveen Kumar Reddy
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-01

8.  Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ajith R Pillai; Anil Gangadharan; Satheesh Kumar; Anwar Shah
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.