Literature DB >> 7857894

A study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.

A Downing1, J McCabe, P Gordon.   

Abstract

The differences in magnitude of static and kinetic frictional forces generated by 0.022 x 0.030-inch stainless steel (Dentaurum) and polycrystalline ceramic (Transcend) brackets in combination with archwires of different sizes (0.018 inch and 0.019 x 0.025 inch) and materials (stainless steel, nickel-titanium, and beta-titanium) at a constant ligature force were investigated. A friction-testing assembly using the Instron machine was used. In all cases, the static frictional force was greater than the kinetic frictional force. There were no significant differences in the frictional forces generated by stainless steel and polycrystalline ceramic brackets. Beta-titanium archwires produced greater frictional forces than the other two materials. Increasing the archwire diameter increased the frictional force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7857894     DOI: 10.1179/bjo.21.4.349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Orthod        ISSN: 0301-228X


  10 in total

1.  In-vitro study of surface changes in fixed orthodontic appliances following air polishing with Clinpro Prophy and Air-Flow.

Authors:  Benedict Wilmes; Shervin Vali; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.

Authors:  Susanne Reimann; Christoph Bourauel; Anna Weber; Cornelius Dirk; Thomas Lietz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Effect of sodium bicarbonate air abrasive polishing on attrition and surface micromorphology of ceramic and stainless steel brackets.

Authors:  Eduardo Augusto Parmagnani; Roberta Tarkany Basting
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  K Ranjan R Bhat; Nausheer Ahmed; Rithika Joseph; Abrar Younus A
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-15

5.  Evaluation of surface roughness of orthodontic wires by means of atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Vincenzo D'Antò; Roberto Rongo; Gianluca Ametrano; Gianrico Spagnuolo; Paolo Manzo; Roberto Martina; Sergio Paduano; Rosa Valletta
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics.

Authors:  A Alper Oz; Nursel Arici; Selim Arici
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of the friction of self-ligating and conventional bracket systems.

Authors:  Simona Tecco; Donato Di Iorio; Riccardo Nucera; Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Giancarlo Cordasco; Felice Festa
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-07

8.  Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva--an in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo; Matheus Melo Pithon; José Vinicius Bolognesi Maciel; Ana Maria Bolognese
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Frictional Forces Produced by Three Different Ligation Methods in Two Different Types of Brackets in 0.016 Nickel-Titanium Wire: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  B Kanagasabapathy; M M Varadharaja; R Saravanan; V Vignesh Kumar; R Mahalakshmi; Reshmi Leila Ninan; A Srivel Vigneswari; S Dwaragesh
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

10.  Comparison of static friction and surface topography of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic arch wires: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Nouf Alsabti; Nabeel Talic
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-03-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.