Literature DB >> 7856788

The limits of thresholds: silica and the politics of science, 1935 to 1990.

G Markowitz1, D Rosner.   

Abstract

Since the 1930s threshold limit values have been presented as an objectively established measure of US industrial safety. However, there have been important questions raised regarding the adequacy of these thresholds for protecting workers from silicosis. This paper explores the historical debates over silica threshold limit values and the intense political negotiation that accompanied their establishment. In the 1930s and early 1940s, a coalition of business, public health, insurance, and political interests formed in response to a widely perceived "silicosis crisis." Part of the resulting program aimed at containing the crisis was the establishment of threshold limit values. Yet silicosis cases continued to be documented. By the 1960s these cases had become the basis for a number of revisions to the thresholds. In the 1970s, following a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommendation to lower the threshold limit value for silica and to eliminate sand as an abrasive in blasting, industry fought attempts to make the existing values more stringent. This paper traces the process by which threshold limit values became part of a compromise between the health of workers and the economic interests of industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7856788      PMCID: PMC1615313          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.2.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  3 in total

1.  EVOLUTION OF OUR CONCEPTS OF STANDARDS.

Authors:  D D IRISH
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1965-04

2.  Does silicosis still occur?

Authors:  D J Valiante; K D Rosenman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Seeking common ground: a history of labor and Blue Cross.

Authors:  G Markowitz; D Rosner
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.265

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  The long struggle to protect workers' lungs against silicosis.

Authors:  David Rosner
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  The origins of health standards for quartz exposure.

Authors:  H E Ayer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Dust diseases and the legacy of corporate manipulation of science and law.

Authors:  David Egilman; Tess Bird; Caroline Lee
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-04

4.  The reawakening of national concern about silicosis.

Authors:  G Markowitz; D Rosner
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.