Literature DB >> 7856295

Developments in mucosal influenza virus vaccines.

H Kuno-Sakai1, M Kimura, K Ohta, R Shimojima, Y Oh, H Fukumi.   

Abstract

Immunogenicity and efficacy of aerosol inactivated split influenza virus vaccines, which are threefold the strength of the vaccines for parenteral use, and cold-adapted reassortant live influenza virus vaccines were evaluated. Mucosal immune responses were evaluated by quantifying specific IgA antibody of the nasal swab solution, and systemic immune responses were evaluated by determining serum haemagglutination inhibition antibody levels. Efficacy of the aerosol inactivated vaccine was evaluated by a challenge test using live vaccine virus. It was concluded that mucosally administered inactivated influenza virus vaccine stimulated systemic and mucosal immune responses more strongly than live influenza virus vaccine and manifested a much stronger booster effect than live vaccine. Mucosal administration of inactivated influenza virus vaccine was effective in preventing infection by live vaccine virus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7856295     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(94)80056-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  13 in total

1.  Current and Future Use of Vaccines for Viral and Bacterial Respiratory Tract Infections.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Is there a role for a mucosal influenza vaccine in the elderly?

Authors:  E M Corrigan; R L Clancy
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Green tea cultivar 'Benifuuki' potentiates split vaccine-induced immunoglobulin A production.

Authors:  Yeong-Seon Won; Motofumi Kumazoe; Kanako Takamatsu; Yuki Shinoda; Saki Sonoda; Kenji Okada; Takehisa Okamoto; Hirofumi Tachibana
Journal:  J Nat Med       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.343

4.  Vaccination with a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus expressing an influenza virus hemagglutinin provides complete protection from influenza virus challenge.

Authors:  A Roberts; E Kretzschmar; A S Perkins; J Forman; R Price; L Buonocore; Y Kawaoka; J K Rose
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  Vaccination strategies for mucosal immune responses.

Authors:  P L Ogra; H Faden; R C Welliver
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Attenuated vesicular stomatitis viruses as vaccine vectors.

Authors:  A Roberts; L Buonocore; R Price; J Forman; J K Rose
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 7.  Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Alessandro Rivetti; Carlo Di Pietrantonj; Vittorio Demicheli; Eliana Ferroni
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

8.  Intranasal immunization with influenza VLPs incorporating membrane-anchored flagellin induces strong heterosubtypic protection.

Authors:  Bao-Zhong Wang; Rui Xu; Fu-Shi Quan; Sang-Moo Kang; Li Wang; Richard W Compans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A dose-escalation study of aerosolized sargramostim in the treatment of metastatic melanoma: an NCCTG Study.

Authors:  Svetomir N Markovic; Vera J Suman; Wendy K Nevala; Louis Geeraerts; Edward T Creagan; Lori A Erickson; Kendrith M Rowland; Roscoe F Morton; William L Horvath; Mark R Pittelkow
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  Development of mucosal adjuvants for intranasal vaccine for H5N1 influenza viruses.

Authors:  Hideki Hasegawa; Takeshi Ichinohe; Akira Ainai; Shin-Ichi Tamura; Takeshi Kurata
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.