Literature DB >> 7854521

Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: a simple approach to evaluate disease progression.

M J Hohol1, E J Orav, H L Weiner.   

Abstract

Current clinical scales in multiple sclerosis (MS) are often complicated to administer, suffer from interrater variability and lack of uniform representation across grades, and are insensitive to progression at certain stages. Furthermore, they are not easily applied by neurologists and do not clearly differentiate among functional stages of MS. For these reasons, we developed Disease Steps to assess disability in MS. A total of 1,323 patients were classified using both Disease Steps and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) for a total of 2,755 assessments. The Disease Steps scale consists of 0 = Normal; 1 = Mild disability, mild symptoms or signs; 2 = Moderate disability, visible abnormality of gait; 3 = Early cane, intermittent use of cane; 4 = Late cane, cane-dependent; 5 = Bilateral support; 6 = Confined to wheelchair; and U = Unclassifiable. Results demonstrate that raters could simply and quickly categorize patients using Disease Steps. Patients were uniformly distributed with Disease Steps, whereas a bimodal distribution occurred with the EDSS. On the EDSS, 40.3% of patients scored between 1.0 and 3.5 and 36.0% scored from 6.0 to 6.5, with only 6.9% of patients scoring between 4.0 and 5.5. For 60 patients seen by two neurologists, concordance between raters was excellent for Disease Steps (kappa = 0.8) but only moderate for the EDSS (kappa = 0.54). As a simple and reproducible measure of different functional steps of MS, Disease Steps can be used as a guide in therapeutic decision-making, following response to therapy, and in assessing disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7854521     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.45.2.251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  138 in total

1.  Couples coping with multiple sclerosis: a dyadic perspective on the roles of mindfulness and acceptance.

Authors:  Kenneth I Pakenham; Christina Samios
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-06-12

2.  A novel approach to estimate the minimally important difference for the Fatigue Impact Scale in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Regina Rendas-Baum; Min Yang; Francoise Cattelin; Gene V Wallenstein; John D Fisk
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Pelvic floor disorders and multiple sclerosis: are patients satisfied with their care?

Authors:  Sangeeta T Mahajan; Rebecca James; Heidi Frasure
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2014

4.  Development of the multiple sclerosis (MS) early mobility impairment questionnaire (EMIQ).

Authors:  Tjalf Ziemssen; Glenn Phillips; Ruchit Shah; Adam Mathias; Catherine Foley; Cheryl Coon; Rohini Sen; Andrew Lee; Sonalee Agarwal
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Goals set after completing a teleconference-delivered program for managing multiple sclerosis fatigue.

Authors:  Miho Asano; Katharine Preissner; Rose Duffy; Maggie Meixell; Marcia Finlayson
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2015 May-Jun

6.  Impact of natalizumab on patient-reported outcomes in a clinical practice setting: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Siddhesh A Kamat; Krithika Rajagopalan; Judith J Stephenson; Sonalee Agarwal
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  A forgotten aspect of the NICE reference case: an observational study of the health related quality of life impact on caregivers of people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sarah Acaster; Rodolphe Perard; Deven Chauhan; Andrew J Lloyd
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The prevalence of urinary catheterization in women and men with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sangeeta T Mahajan; Heidi E Frasure; Ruth Ann Marrie
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Living with multiple sclerosis: longitudinal changes in employment and the importance of symptom management.

Authors:  Rex D Simmons; Kate L Tribe; Elizabeth A McDonald
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Disability in multiple sclerosis: a reference for patients and clinicians.

Authors:  Ilya Kister; Eric Chamot; Amber R Salter; Gary R Cutter; Tamar E Bacon; Joseph Herbert
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.