OBJECTIVE: To consider the impact on primary care patient outcomes of using both a screener to determine elevated anxiety levels among patients with previously undetected anxiety and a physician intervention to inform physicians of their patients' conditions. DESIGN: Participating physicians were randomized to either the demonstration or the control arm, and patients were assigned to a study arm based on the randomization of their physicians. The patients were followed for change in outcome measures during the five-month study period. SETTING: A mixed-model health maintenance organization serving approximately 110,000 enrollees in central Colorado. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 573 patients who had unrecognized and untreated anxiety identified from the approximately 8,000 patients who completed the waiting room screening questionnaire. INTERVENTIONS: A physician intervention served the dual function of 1) providing an educational demonstration of anxiety in the primary care setting and 2) providing a reporting system for summarizing the anxiety symptom levels and functioning status of the patients enrolled in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient outcomes were measured as changes in global anxiety scores, functioning and well-being, and patients' reports of global improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that this method of reporting symptoms and functioning status to primary care physicians did not significantly change patient outcomes. Improvement in outcomes appeared to be more closely associated with the patient's severity of psychological distress.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To consider the impact on primary care patient outcomes of using both a screener to determine elevated anxiety levels among patients with previously undetected anxiety and a physician intervention to inform physicians of their patients' conditions. DESIGN: Participating physicians were randomized to either the demonstration or the control arm, and patients were assigned to a study arm based on the randomization of their physicians. The patients were followed for change in outcome measures during the five-month study period. SETTING: A mixed-model health maintenance organization serving approximately 110,000 enrollees in central Colorado. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 573 patients who had unrecognized and untreated anxiety identified from the approximately 8,000 patients who completed the waiting room screening questionnaire. INTERVENTIONS: A physician intervention served the dual function of 1) providing an educational demonstration of anxiety in the primary care setting and 2) providing a reporting system for summarizing the anxiety symptom levels and functioning status of the patients enrolled in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Patient outcomes were measured as changes in global anxiety scores, functioning and well-being, and patients' reports of global improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that this method of reporting symptoms and functioning status to primary care physicians did not significantly change patient outcomes. Improvement in outcomes appeared to be more closely associated with the patient's severity of psychological distress.
Authors: K Magruder-Habib; W W Zung; J R Feussner; W C Alling; W B Saunders; H A Stevens Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 1989-05 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Tasneem L Talib; Timothy E Stump; Jacob Kean; David A Haggstrom; Paige DeChant; Kittie R Lake; Madison Stout; Patrick O Monahan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jantien Heideman; Eric van Rijswijk; Nieke van Lin; Sandra de Loos; Miranda Laurant; Michel Wensing; Eloy van de Lisdonk; Richard Grol Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Anna D T Muntingh; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Harm W J van Marwijk; Philip Spinhoven; Willem J J Assendelft; Margot W M de Waal; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen; Herman J Adèr; Anton J L M van Balkom Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: J M Valderas; A Kotzeva; M Espallargues; G Guyatt; C E Ferrans; M Y Halyard; D A Revicki; T Symonds; A Parada; J Alonso Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2008-01-04 Impact factor: 4.147