Literature DB >> 7852980

Children's use of mnemonic strategies: variability in response to metamemory training.

B D Cox1.   

Abstract

In this study, 8- to 12-year-old children were tested to determine their level of use of a strategy for organizing lists of low-associated words into semantic groups. Then, on the basis of their scores in the strategy tests, the children were placed in either a strategic or nonstrategic group. The groups were divided into a sort-instruction training condition, in which they were told to group words so that they "go together" in some way, and a metamemory training condition, in which these instructions were supplemented by feedback, strategy reminders, and opportunities to self-test. One week later, each child's strategy use was reassessed. Children in the strategic group sorted semantically throughout training and transfer, and they showed high recall, regardless of condition. Children in the nonstrategic group showed high strategy use and recall during training, but they showed significantly more variability in recall than did the children in the strategic group. Children in the nonstrategic-metamemory condition who benefited from training were also more likely to transfer the use of the strategy than were children trained in the sort-instruction condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7852980     DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1994.9914792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1325            Impact factor:   1.509


  3 in total

1.  Training-induced compensation versus magnification of individual differences in memory performance.

Authors:  Martin Lövdén; Yvonne Brehmer; Shu-Chen Li; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  The relationship between intelligence and training gains is moderated by training strategy.

Authors:  Hyunkyu Lee; Walter R Boot; Pauline L Baniqued; Michelle W Voss; Ruchika Shaurya Prakash; Chandramallika Basak; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Most evidence for the compensation account of cognitive training is unreliable.

Authors:  Tomasz Smoleń; Jan Jastrzebski; Eduardo Estrada; Adam Chuderski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.