Literature DB >> 7852903

Regulation of feeding behavior in adult Drosophila melanogaster varies with feeding regime and nutritional state.

R S Edgecomb1, C E Harth, A M Schneiderman.   

Abstract

The regulation of feeding behavior in adult Drosophila melanogaster includes such elements as ingestion responsiveness, volume ingested in a single meal, food storage in the crop and rate of defecation. Our results suggest that feeding behavior varies in a manner dependent on feeding regime (food-deprived or ad-libitum-fed) and nutritional state. Fed flies that are subsequently food-deprived become increasingly more responsive to food stimuli over time and, when offered 1% agar diets containing different concentrations of sucrose, ingest greater amounts of diets that have higher sucrose concentrations. When fed ad libitum for 72 h on these same diets, D. melanogaster maintained much smaller crops on average than food-deprived flies fed a single meal. Additionally, ad-libitum-fed flies are grouped into two categories depending on the concentration of sucrose in the diet. Flies fed for 72 h on 1% agar diets having 50 mmoll-1 sucrose or more are not affected by the concentration of sucrose in the diet, while flies fed on diets of 15 or 25 mmoll-1 sucrose increase ingestion responsiveness, crop size and the rate of defecation with decreasing concentrations of sucrose in the diet. Flies fed on even lower sucrose concentrations (5 or 10 mmoll-1 sucrose) for 27-72 h exhibit both a shift over time to larger crop sizes and increased mortality over those of flies fed 15 mmoll-1 sucrose. These data suggest that flies fed ad libitum are capable of modulating their feeding behavior in response to their nutritional state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7852903     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.197.1.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  69 in total

1.  Remembering nutrient quality of sugar in Drosophila.

Authors:  Christopher J Burke; Scott Waddell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Counting calories in Drosophila diet restriction.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Min; Thomas Flatt; Indrek Kulaots; Marc Tatar
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 4.032

3.  Dietary composition specifies consumption, obesity, and lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Danielle A Skorupa; Azra Dervisefendic; Jessica Zwiener; Scott D Pletcher
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 9.304

4.  Gender-specific prandial response to dietary restriction and oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Chaoyang Zeng; Yanping Du; Thomas Alberico; Jeanne Seeberger; Xiaoping Sun; Sige Zou
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.160

5.  Combining Quantitative Food-intake Assays and Forcibly Activating Neurons to Study Appetite in Drosophila.

Authors:  Lifen Jiang; Yinpeng Zhan; Yan Zhu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Allocrine modulation of feeding behavior by the Sex Peptide of Drosophila.

Authors:  Gil B Carvalho; Pankaj Kapahi; David J Anderson; Seymour Benzer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Feeding regulation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Allan-Hermann Pool; Kristin Scott
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  The role of anorexia in resistance and tolerance to infections in Drosophila.

Authors:  Janelle S Ayres; David S Schneider
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Dietary modulation of Drosophila sleep-wake behaviour.

Authors:  James H Catterson; Seymour Knowles-Barley; Katherine James; Margarete M S Heck; Anthony J Harmar; Paul S Hartley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Novel mutations affecting the Na, K ATPase alpha model complex neurological diseases and implicate the sodium pump in increased longevity.

Authors:  Lesley J Ashmore; Stacy L Hrizo; Sarah M Paul; Wayne A Van Voorhies; Greg J Beitel; Michael J Palladino
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.