Literature DB >> 7852573

Disk diffusion versus broth microdilution susceptibility testing of Haemophilus species and Moraxella catarrhalis using seven oral antimicrobial agents: application of updated susceptibility guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

P C Kibsey1, R P Rennie, J E Rushton.   

Abstract

Susceptibility testing of Haemophilus species and Moraxella catarrhalis is medium and inoculum dependent. Seven oral agents, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefaclor, loracarbef, cefuroxime-axetil, cefixime, and erythromycin, were tested against 400 beta-lactamase-positive and -negative clinically significant respiratory strains of Haemophilus species and 100 strains of M. catarrhalis. Sources of the strains included teaching and regional hospitals and a private laboratory. All strains were tested by broth microdilution and disk diffusion in haemophilus test medium for Haemophilus species and Mueller-Hinton broth and agar for M. catarrhalis. Appropriate National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) standards were followed. For Haemophilus species, by disk diffusion and broth microdilution, respectively, 27 and 27% of strains were resistant to ampicillin, 37 and 5% were resistant to erythromycin, 3 and 0.5% were resistant to cefaclor, 2 and 0.5% were resistant to loracarbef, and 0% were resistant to cefuroxime-axetil, cefixime, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. beta-Lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains were not observed. Of M. catarrhalis strains, 56% were resistant to ampicillin by disk diffusion and 95% were resistant by broth microdilution. This species was susceptible to all other agents tested by either method. The disagreements between disk diffusion results and MICs for cefaclor, ampicillin, cefuroxime, and loracarbef that occurred with use of the 1990 NCCLS tables were resolved when the 1992 NCCLS tables were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7852573      PMCID: PMC264160          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2786-2790.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to antimicrobial agents used in Canada. Canadian Study Group.

Authors:  L D Tremblay; J L'Ecuyer; P Provencher; M G Bergeron
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Reproducibility of disc susceptibility tests with Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  A L Barry; J H Jorgensen; D J Hardy
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Problems with current recommendations for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  P M Mendelman; E A Wiley; T L Stull; C Clausen; D O Chaffin; O Onay
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activities of 39 antimicrobial agents for Branhamella catarrhalis and comparison of results with different quantitative susceptibility test methods.

Authors:  G V Doern; T A Tubert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Branhamella catarrhalis: an organism gaining respect as a pathogen.

Authors:  B W Catlin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; G V Doern; L A Maher; A W Howell; J S Redding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Susceptibilities of beta-lactamase-producing and -nonproducing ampicillin-resistant strains of Haemophilus influenzae to ceftibuten, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefixime, cefotaxime, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs; M A Pfaller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Influence of growth medium and supplement on growth of Haemophilus influenzae and on antibacterial activity of several antibiotics.

Authors:  M G Bergeron; P Simard; P Provencher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae using haemophilus test medium.

Authors:  G V Doern; J H Jorgensen; C Thornsberry; H Snapper
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Branhamella catarrhalis with ampicillin and seven other antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  G V Doern; T Tubert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  3 in total

1.  Haemophilus influenzae: then and now.

Authors:  J Z Jordens; M P Slack
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Development of a disk diffusion method for testing Moraxella catarrhalis susceptibility using clinical and laboratory standards institute methods: a SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program report.

Authors:  Jan M Bell; John D Turnidge; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Cefuroxime axetil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  C M Perry; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.