Literature DB >> 7852433

Facial injury: a review of biomechanical studies and test procedures for facial injury assessment.

D Hampson1.   

Abstract

A review of biomechanical studies that have attempted to measure fracture tolerances of facial bones has been carried out. The particular bones of interest were the mandible, the zygoma, the maxilla and the nasal bones. Numerical values have been given for the peak force and pressure fracture tolerances for these bones. A study of these values illustrates just how variable the bone strength of various individuals is. A review of various methods that have attempted to measure and quantify the physical effects of a blow to the face has also been carried out. Three major types of test procedure exist, namely frangible elements, peak force and pressure sensing elements and deformable elements. Frangible and deformable elements generally replace the face of a standard test dummy, fracturing and deforming at appropriate impact force levels, respectively. These surrogate face forms are used for two different reasons; either they are used to measure the damage to the human face for some impact scenario or they are simply used to better simulate the response of the whole head to impact by simulating the compliance of the face. Peak force and pressure sensing elements take the form of piezoelectric sensors and pressure-sensitive, colour 'Fuji film'. Both these methods are complicated and really only suitable for research purposes only. Finally, it is recommended that a mathematical model approach be used to establish the principal injury mechanism and support further development of an acceptable face form test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7852433     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)80001-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  Biomechanics and injury risk of a headbutt.

Authors:  Jiri Adamec; Vera Mai; Matthias Graw; Klaus Schneider; John-Martin Hempel; Jutta Schöpfer
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  The Le Fort system revisited: Trauma velocity predicts the path of Le Fort I fractures through the lateral buttress.

Authors:  Grayson Roumeliotis; Romy Ahluwalia; Thomas Jenkyn; Arjang Yazdani
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  The use of combined thermal/pressure polyvinylidene fluoride film airflow sensor in polysomnography.

Authors:  Meir Kryger; Todd Eiken; Li Qin
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Diagnostic reliability of low dose multidetector CT and cone beam CT in maxillofacial trauma-an experimental blinded and randomized study.

Authors:  Romke Rozema; Michiel Hj Doff; Peter Ma van Ooijen; Douwe Postmus; Henriëtte E Westerlaan; Martijn F Boomsma; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  The facial skeleton: Armor to the brain?

Authors:  Satishkumar G Patil; Bindu S Patil; Udupikrishna Joshi; Soumya Allurkar; Sharanabasappa Japatti; Ashwini Munnangi
Journal:  Indian J Dent       Date:  2016-09

6.  Crash test-based assessment of injury risks for adults and children when colliding with personal mobility devices and service robots.

Authors:  Diego Paez-Granados; Aude Billard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Associated Injuries in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Study in a Tertiary Hospital in South India.

Authors:  Satishkumar G Patil; Ashwini Munnangi; UdupiKrishna Joshi; Nitin Thakur; Soumya Allurkar; Bindu S Patil
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-02-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.