Literature DB >> 7851828

[Hardened anodized aluminum as a replacement material for bracket manufacture].

H Fischer-Brandies1, M Bönhoff.   

Abstract

Attention has been repeatedly drawn to the problem of corrosion and the risk of allergic reaction to nickel resulting from the use of stainless steel brackets. In the search for a suitable alternative, manufacturers have turned to thin coating technology using hardened anodized aluminium. Applying resistance to corrosion and abrasion as the criteria to be met, they have selected aluminium alloy type 6082 as the material of choice. Purpose of this study is to examine the physical suitability of this material. Using the above noted alloy, 60 prototype brackets were made with a hardened anodized surface. They were then subjected to the following 3 stress tests: first an abrasion test using a tooth polishing machine, second, a deformation test using a device designed to simulate torque movement, and, third, a corrosion test. The effects on the brackets resulting from the three types of stress were evaluated by light microscopy. A quantitative analysis of the corrosion test was performed by ICP spectrometry. The control group consisted of conventional stainless steel brackets. The light microscopic analysis revealed no evidence of surface damage or signs of deformation in the prototype brackets. The steel brackets, on the other hand, showed clear signs of wear and corrosion. The quantitative analysis of the corrosion solution revealed metallic ion wear of 1.75 ng x mm-2 x h-1 for the prototypes subjected to abrasion. The steel brackets showed at a factor of around 104.6 metallic ion wear of 183 ng x mm-2 x h-1. In addition to this, no Ni ions were found in the corrosion solution of the prototype brackets.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7851828     DOI: 10.1007/bf02285420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop        ISSN: 0015-816X


  10 in total

1.  Allergic response to stainless steel wire.

Authors:  W R Schriver; R H Shereff; J M Domnitz; E F Swintak; S Civjan
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1976-11

2.  [Allergenic potency of high nickel non-precious metal alloys: comparative epicutaneous tests with Wiron 88 and corresponding metallic salts].

Authors:  G Nolten; H Hofmann; G Goerz
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1987-10

3.  [Damage from galvanic corrosion of dental alloys].

Authors:  H Zitter; P Pitner
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1979-11

4.  [Saliva analysis in orthodontic patients to prove content of dissolved metals].

Authors:  B Kratzenstein; P Koppenburg; K H Sauer; J Geis-Gerstorfer; H Weber
Journal:  Quintessenz       Date:  1988-04

5.  [In-vivo corrosion studies of orthodontic appliances].

Authors:  B Kratzenstein; H Weber; J Geis-Gerstorfer; P Koppenburg
Journal:  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z       Date:  1985-11

6.  Allergy in surface lesions of the oral mucosa.

Authors:  N H Rickles
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1972-05

7.  [Importance of the corrosion factor in bracket adhesive technics].

Authors:  H F Kappert; I Jonas; T Rakosi
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1984-08

Review 8.  Biological effects of nickel-containing dental alloys. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment.

Authors:  J P Moffa
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Corrosion of resin-bonded orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  A J Gwinnett
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1982-06

10.  Corrosion of orthodontic bracket bases.

Authors:  R Maijer; D C Smith
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1982-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.