Literature DB >> 7851761

Nonhomologous synapsis and reduced crossing over in a heterozygous paracentric inversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

M E Dresser1, D J Ewing, S N Harwell, D Coody, M N Conrad.   

Abstract

Homologous chromosome synapsis ("homosynapsis") and crossing over are well-conserved aspects of meiotic chromosome behavior. The long-standing assumption that these two processes are causally related has been challenged recently by observations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae of significant levels of crossing over (1) between small sequences at nonhomologous locations and (2) in mutants where synapsis is abnormal or absent. In order to avoid problems of local sequence effects and of mutation pleiotropy, we have perturbed synapsis by making a set of isogenic strains that are heterozygous and homozygous for a large chromosomal paracentric inversion covering a well marked genetic interval and then measured recombination. We find that reciprocal recombination in the marked interval in heterozygotes is reduced variably across the interval, on average to approximately 55% of that in the homozygotes, and that positive interference still modulates crossing over. Cytologically, stable synapsis across the interval is apparently heterologous rather than homologous, consistent with the interpretation that stable homosynapsis is required to initiate or consummate a large fraction of the crossing over observed in wild-type strains. When crossing over does occur in heterozygotes, dicentric and acentric chromosomes are formed and can be visualized and quantitated on blots though not demonstrated in viable spores. We find that there is no loss of dicentric chromosomes during the two meiotic divisions and that the acentric chromosome is recovered at only 1/3 to 1/2 of the expected level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7851761      PMCID: PMC1206214     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  32 in total

1.  Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over: their relationship to each other and to chromosome synapsis and segregation.

Authors:  J Engebrecht; J Hirsch; G S Roeder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-09-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Meiotic chromosome synapsis in a haploid yeast.

Authors:  J Loidl; K Nairz; F Klein
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Preferential Occurrence of Nonsister Spores in Two-Spored Asci of SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE: Evidence for Regulation of Spore-Wall Formation by the Spindle Pole Body.

Authors:  L S Davidow; L Goetsch; B Byers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The relationship of homologous synapsis and crossing over in a maize inversion.

Authors:  M P Maguire; R W Riess
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Meiosis in asynaptic yeast.

Authors:  B Rockmill; G S Roeder
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Chromosomal translocations generated by high-frequency meiotic recombination between repeated yeast genes.

Authors:  S Jinks-Robertson; T D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Meiotic gene conversion and crossing over between dispersed homologous sequences occurs frequently in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Lichten; R H Borts; J E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  R Padmore; L Cao; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-09-20       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  A mathematical model of interference for use in constructing linkage maps from tetrad data.

Authors:  J S King; R K Mortimer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Introduction of extra telomeric DNA sequences into Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in telomere elongation.

Authors:  K W Runge; V A Zakian
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  21 in total

1.  Slk19p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae regulates anaphase spindle dynamics through two independent mechanisms.

Authors:  Kyle A Havens; Melissa K Gardner; Rebecca J Kamieniecki; Michael E Dresser; Dean S Dawson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Heterozygous insertions alter crossover distribution but allow crossover interference in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Marc Hammarlund; M Wayne Davis; Hung Nguyen; Dustin Dayton; Erik M Jorgensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  DMC1 functions in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic pathway that is largely independent of the RAD51 pathway.

Authors:  M E Dresser; D J Ewing; M N Conrad; A M Dominguez; R Barstead; H Jiang; T Kodadek
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Meiotic Centromere Coupling and Pairing Function by Two Separate Mechanisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Emily L Kurdzo; David Obeso; Hoa Chuong; Dean S Dawson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Meiotic exchange and segregation in female mice heterozygous for paracentric inversions.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Elise A Millie; Jonathan P Cherry; Stefanie E Schrump; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  MPS3 mediates meiotic bouquet formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Michael N Conrad; Chih-Ying Lee; Joseph L Wilkerson; Michael E Dresser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Fpr3 and Zip3 ensure that initiation of meiotic recombination precedes chromosome synapsis in budding yeast.

Authors:  Amy J Macqueen; G Shirleen Roeder
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Mps1 and Ipl1/Aurora B act sequentially to correctly orient chromosomes on the meiotic spindle of budding yeast.

Authors:  Régis E Meyer; Seoyoung Kim; David Obeso; Paul D Straight; Mark Winey; Dean S Dawson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  The Interchromosomal Effect: Different Meanings for Different Organisms.

Authors:  Danny E Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The synaptonemal complex protein Zip1 promotes bi-orientation of centromeres at meiosis I.

Authors:  Mara N Gladstone; David Obeso; Hoa Chuong; Dean S Dawson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.