Literature DB >> 7851326

Corrected likelihood for proportional hazards measurement error model and its application.

T Nakamura1, K Akazawa.   

Abstract

Consider the case where the exact values of covariates in the proportional hazards model may not be observed but instead, only surrogates for them involving measurement errors are available. The maximum likelihood estimate based on the partial likelihood with the true covariate replaced by the observed surrogate is even asymptotically biased and may cause seriously misleading results in covariance analysis based on the partial likelihood. These facts are illustrated by Monte Carlo simulation. A correction to partial likelihood proposed by the first author is studied to gain insight into its merits and limitations in practical applications. The results indicate that when the "effective magnitude of the measurement error" as defined in this article is small, which is indeed the case for most applications, the method will be useful. Some other correction methods for the measurement error in censored survival models are also reviewed and discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7851326      PMCID: PMC1566550          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94102s821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  Proportional hazards model with covariates subject to measurement error.

Authors:  T Nakamura
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Allowing for random errors in radiation dose estimates for the atomic bomb survivor data.

Authors:  D A Pierce; D O Stram; M Vaeth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Covariance analysis in generalized linear measurement error models.

Authors:  R J Carroll
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A measurement-error model for binary and ordinal regression.

Authors:  T D Tosteson; L A Stefanski; D W Schafer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Some effects of random dose measurement errors on analyses of atomic bomb survivor data.

Authors:  E S Gilbert
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Mortality of registered A-bomb survivors in Nagasaki, Japan, 1970-1984.

Authors:  S Okajima; M Mine; T Nakamura
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.841

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.