PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to establish the intraobserver and interobserver variability in the assessment of histologic type (tubular, villous, and tubulovillous) and grade of cytologic dysplasia (mild, moderate, and severe) in colorectal adenomas. METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven slides of adenomas were assessed twice by three experienced pathologists, with an interval of two months. Results were analyzed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: For agreement between first and second assessment (both type and grade of dysplasia), kappa values for the three specialists were 0.5345, 0.9022, and 0.4100, respectively. Agreement was better for type than for dysplasia. The strength of agreement was moderate for Observers A and C and almost perfect for Observer B. Agreement between all three observers was seen in 35.2 percent for both type and dysplasia in 61 percent for type and in 47.8 percent for dysplasia. The kappa values for Observer A vs. B and Observer C vs. B were 0.3480 and 0.3770, respectively (both type and dysplasia). Values for type were better than for dysplasia, but agreement was only fair to moderate. CONCLUSION: The interobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect, but the intraobserver agreement was only fair to moderate. A simpler classification system or a centralization of assessments would probably increase kappa values.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to establish the intraobserver and interobserver variability in the assessment of histologic type (tubular, villous, and tubulovillous) and grade of cytologic dysplasia (mild, moderate, and severe) in colorectal adenomas. METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven slides of adenomas were assessed twice by three experienced pathologists, with an interval of two months. Results were analyzed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: For agreement between first and second assessment (both type and grade of dysplasia), kappa values for the three specialists were 0.5345, 0.9022, and 0.4100, respectively. Agreement was better for type than for dysplasia. The strength of agreement was moderate for Observers A and C and almost perfect for Observer B. Agreement between all three observers was seen in 35.2 percent for both type and dysplasia in 61 percent for type and in 47.8 percent for dysplasia. The kappa values for Observer A vs. B and Observer C vs. B were 0.3480 and 0.3770, respectively (both type and dysplasia). Values for type were better than for dysplasia, but agreement was only fair to moderate. CONCLUSION: The interobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect, but the intraobserver agreement was only fair to moderate. A simpler classification system or a centralization of assessments would probably increase kappa values.
Authors: Olca Basturk; Seung-Mo Hong; Laura D Wood; N Volkan Adsay; Jorge Albores-Saavedra; Andrew V Biankin; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Michael Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Yo Kato; David S Klimstra; Günter Klöppel; Alyssa Krasinskas; Daniel S Longnecker; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan A Offerhaus; Michio Shimizu; Kyoichi Takaori; Benoit Terris; Shinichi Yachida; Irene Esposito; Toru Furukawa Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Marloes A Smit; Gabi W van Pelt; Elisabeth Mc Dequeker; Raed Al Dieri; Rob Aem Tollenaar; J Han Jm van Krieken; Wilma E Mesker Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2021-03-19
Authors: Beekam Kebede Olkeba; Pieter Boets; Seid Tiku Mereta; Belayhun Mandefro; Gemechu Debesa; Mahmud Ahmednur; Argaw Ambelu; Wolyu Korma; Peter L M Goethals Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lisanne J H Smits; Elisa Vink-Börger; Gesina van Lijnschoten; Isabelle Focke-Snieders; Rachel S van der Post; Jurriaan B Tuynman; Nicole C T van Grieken; Iris D Nagtegaal Journal: Histopathology Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 7.778