Literature DB >> 7851108

A Bayesian approach to establishing sample size and monitoring criteria for phase II clinical trials.

P F Thall1, R Simon.   

Abstract

Thall and Simon propose a Bayesian approach to phase II clinical trials with binary outcomes and continuous monitoring. The efficacy theta E of an experimental treatment E is evaluated relative to that of a standard treatment S based on data from an uncontrolled trial of E, an informative prior for theta S, and a noninformative prior for theta E. The trial continues until E is shown with high posterior probability to be either promising or not promising, or until a predetermined maximum sample size is reached. Operating characteristics are evaluated under fixed values of the success probability of E. In this paper, we propose two extensions of this decision structure, describe sample size and monitoring criteria, and provide numerical guidelines for implementation. The first extension gives criteria from early termination of trials unlikely to yield conclusive results, based on the marginal (predictive) distribution of the observed success rate. The second extension allows early termination only if E is found to be not promising compared to S. Operating characteristics of each of these designs are evaluated numerically over a range of design parameterizations. We also examine the effects of intermittent monitoring on the design's properties. An application of this approach to a leukemia biochemotherapy trial is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7851108     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90004-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  12 in total

1.  Bayesian communication: a clinically significant paradigm for electronic publication.

Authors:  H P Lehmann; S N Goodman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  J Jack Lee; Diane D Liu
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Phase I and extension study of clofarabine plus cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Stefan Faderl; Kumudha Balakrishnan; Deborah A Thomas; Farhad Ravandi; Gautam Borthakur; Jan Burger; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Jorge Cortes; Susan O'Brien; Tapan Kadia; Jennie Feliu; William Plunkett; Varsha Gandhi; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2013-12-17

4.  Bayesian clinical trials at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: An update.

Authors:  Rebecca S Slack Tidwell; S Andrew Peng; Minxing Chen; Diane D Liu; Ying Yuan; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  A Bayesian approach for unplanned sample sizes in phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Yimei Li; Rosemarie Mick; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Lenalidomide induces complete and partial remissions in patients with relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Alessandra Ferrajoli; Bang-Ning Lee; Ellen J Schlette; Susan M O'Brien; Hui Gao; Sijin Wen; William G Wierda; Zeev Estrov; Stefan Faderl; Evan N Cohen; Changping Li; James M Reuben; Michael J Keating
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  The utility of Bayesian predictive probabilities for interim monitoring of clinical trials.

Authors:  Benjamin R Saville; Jason T Connor; Gregory D Ayers; JoAnn Alvarez
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in advanced pancreatic cancer: results of two phase II studies.

Authors:  Milind M Javle; Rachna T Shroff; Henry Xiong; Gauri A Varadhachary; David Fogelman; Shrikanth A Reddy; Darren Davis; Yujian Zhang; Robert A Wolff; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Bayesian designs of phase II oncology trials to select maximum effective dose assuming monotonic dose-response relationship.

Authors:  Beibei Guo; Yisheng Li
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Advantages of Bayesian monitoring methods in deciding whether and when to stop a clinical trial: an example of a neonatal cooling trial.

Authors:  Claudia Pedroza; Jon E Tyson; Abhik Das; Abbot Laptook; Edward F Bell; Seetha Shankaran
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.