Literature DB >> 7850536

Stereotactic core needle biopsy of mammographic breast lesions as a viable alternative to surgical biopsy.

R A Mikhail1, R C Nathan, M Weiss, R M Tummala, U R Mullangi, L Lawrence, A Mukkamala.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic needle biopsy technique has received considerable attention as a possible alternative to surgical biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. The exact role of this procedure in the management of mammographic breast lesions has not yet been accurately defined.
METHODS: Data have been collected prospectively on 416 patients over an 8-month period (January 1992 through August 1992). Of 416, 356 patients underwent only stereotactic breast biopsy with a 14-gauge needle. Sixty patients underwent stereotactic breast biopsy followed by surgical biopsy. Based on mammographic findings before biopsy, lesions were classified as benign (24%), likely benign (49%), malignant (2%), likely malignant (6%), and indeterminate (19%). The number of core biopsy specimens obtained from each patient ranged from one to six.
RESULTS: The specimen was considered adequate in 98% of cases. Complications were minimal. The tissue diagnosis was benign in 92% and malignant in 8% of patients. In those patients undergoing surgical and stereotactic biopsy, 57 of 60 had matching histopathological results, representing an agreement rate of 95% (p < 0.001). The three patients whose histopathological results did not match had malignant diagnoses on stereotactic biopsy that were subsequently not identified in the modified radical mastectomy specimen because the entire focus of malignancy was removed by the several passes made by the core needle during biopsy. No patient had a negative stereotactic biopsy result in whom malignancy was later detected by surgical biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates excellent agreement between surgical and stereotactic needle biopsy findings. Stereotactic biopsy with a 14-gauge needle could obviate the need for surgical biopsy in certain women with radiologically benign, likely benign, and indeterminate lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7850536     DOI: 10.1007/bf02303806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  15 in total

1.  CT and sonographically guided needle biopsy: current techniques and new innovations.

Authors:  J W Charboneau; C C Reading; T J Welch
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration for cytologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  M Löfgren; I Andersson; K Lindholm
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Guided percutaneous biopsy of intraabdominal lesions.

Authors:  G S Gazelle; J R Haaga
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Final diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration biopsy for definitive operation in breast cancer.

Authors:  F A Sheikh; G H Tinkoff; T S Kline; H S Neal
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Outpatient breast biopsy.

Authors:  D J Abramson
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Stereotaxic needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions. Cytologic and histopathologic findings.

Authors:  G Svane; C Silfverswärd
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1983

7.  Clinically occult breast lesions: localization and significance.

Authors:  A L Rosenberg; G F Schwartz; S A Feig; A S Patchefsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun.

Authors:  S H Parker; J D Lovin; W E Jobe; J M Luethke; K D Hopper; W F Yakes; B J Burke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Hooked-wire-directed breast biopsy and overpenetrated mammography.

Authors:  M J Silverstein; P Gamagami; R J Rosser; E D Gierson; W J Colburn; N Handel; A G Fingerhut; B S Lewinsky; R S Hoffman; J R Waisman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Fine-needle aspiration of the breast.

Authors:  C S Grant; J R Goellner; J S Welch; J K Martin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  8 in total

1.  Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions.

Authors:  R P Burns; J P Brown; S M Roe; L R Sprouse; A E Yancey; L E Witherspoon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Ultrasound-guided Tru-cut biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  N P Woodcock; I Glaves; D R Morgan; J MacFie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy.

Authors:  M M Moore; C W Hargett; J B Hanks; L L Fajardo; J A Harvey; H F Frierson; C L Slingluff
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Mammographically detected breast cancer. Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy.

Authors:  J H Yim; P Barton; B Weber; D Radford; J Levy; B Monsees; F Flanagan; J A Norton; G M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  When can stereotactic core biopsy replace excisional biopsy?--A clinical perspective.

Authors:  M Morrow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities.

Authors:  G M Fuhrman; G J Cederbom; J S Bolton; T A King; J L Duncan; J L Champaign; D H Smetherman; G H Farr; R R Kuske; W M McKinnon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Microscopic localization of calcifications in and around breast carcinoma: a cautionary note for needle core biopsies.

Authors:  A Selim; S R Tahan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H M Verkooijen; P H Peeters; E Buskens; V C Koot; I H Borel Rinkes; W P Mali; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.