OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of radical prostatectomy (RP) upon quality of life (QOL) in patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with prostate cancer were recruited to evaluate the impact of RP upon QOL. The patients comprised two groups: the first group (n = 51) was evaluated 12 months or longer after RP; and the second group (n = 28) was evaluated 1 month prior to RP. All patients completed two previously reported QOL measures: the Functional Living Index Cancer (FLIC) and Profile of Mood States (POMS), and a series of questions which evaluated bladder, bowel and sexual function. RESULTS: Comparison of patients before RP with those after RP at 12 month follow-up revealed significant (P < 0.05) deterioration in sexual function, continence and hardship scores following RP while tension scores improved significantly. Although 10 other subscale parameters were analysed, no other differences were observed. Of the 51 post-RP patients, 46 (90%) stated that given a choice they would have their surgery again. CONCLUSION: The results reported show that RP has minimal overall impact upon patient QOL. Although minimal voiding and bowel dysfunction was reported, many patients were dissatisfied with post-operative sexual function.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of radical prostatectomy (RP) upon quality of life (QOL) in patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with prostate cancer were recruited to evaluate the impact of RP upon QOL. The patients comprised two groups: the first group (n = 51) was evaluated 12 months or longer after RP; and the second group (n = 28) was evaluated 1 month prior to RP. All patients completed two previously reported QOL measures: the Functional Living Index Cancer (FLIC) and Profile of Mood States (POMS), and a series of questions which evaluated bladder, bowel and sexual function. RESULTS: Comparison of patients before RP with those after RP at 12 month follow-up revealed significant (P < 0.05) deterioration in sexual function, continence and hardship scores following RP while tension scores improved significantly. Although 10 other subscale parameters were analysed, no other differences were observed. Of the 51 post-RP patients, 46 (90%) stated that given a choice they would have their surgery again. CONCLUSION: The results reported show that RP has minimal overall impact upon patient QOL. Although minimal voiding and bowel dysfunction was reported, many patients were dissatisfied with post-operative sexual function.
Authors: E A Schlenk; J A Erlen; J Dunbar-Jacob; J McDowell; S Engberg; S M Sereika; J M Rohay; M J Bernier Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Scott C Roesch; Linda Adams; Amanda Hines; Alan Palmores; Pearlin Vyas; Cindy Tran; Shannon Pekin; Allison A Vaughn Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2005-06
Authors: Paul D Brown; Karla V Ballman; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew J Maurer; Jeff A Sloan; Bradley F Boeve; Lalit Gupta; David F Tang-Wai; Robert M Arusell; Matthew M Clark; Jan C Buckner Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Roman Sosnowski; Michał Szymański; Jan Karol Wolski; Tomasz Nadolski; Tomasz Kalinowski; Tomasz Demkow; Piotr Peczkowski; Małgorzata Pilichowska; Marcin Ligaj; Wojciech Michalski Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2011-12-09