Literature DB >> 7850021

Cortical magnification theory fails to predict visual recognition.

H Strasburger1, I Rentschler, L O Harvey.   

Abstract

The sense of form is poor in indirect view. Yet the cortical magnification theory asserts that the disadvantage can be made up by scaling the image size according to the spatial variation in the mapping of the retina onto the cortex. It is thus assumed that all visual information passes through a functionally homogeneous neural circuitry, with the spatial sampling of input signals varying across the visual field. We challenge this notion by showing that character recognition in the visual field cannot be accommodated by any concept of sole size scaling but requires increasing both size and contrast of the target being viewed. This finding is formalized into a hyperbolic law which states that target size multiplied by log contrast is constant across the visual field. We conclude that the scalar cortical magnification theory fails for character recognition since the latter depends on multidimensional pattern representations in higher, i.e. striate and prestriate, cortical areas.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7850021     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1994.tb00548.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  9 in total

1.  Foveal and extra-foveal orientation discrimination.

Authors:  Sharon L Sally; Rick Gurnsey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Tölz Temporal Topography Study: mapping the visual field across the life span. Part I: the topography of light detection and temporal-information processing.

Authors:  Dorothe A Poggel; Bernhard Treutwein; Claudia Calmanti; Hans Strasburger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Detection and identification of crowded mirror-image letters in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Face or building superiority in peripheral vision reversed by task requirements.

Authors:  Najate Jebara; Delphine Pins; Pascal Despretz; Muriel Boucart
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-09-08

5.  A first- and second-order motion energy analysis of peripheral motion illusions leads to further evidence of "feature blur" in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Arthur G Shapiro; Emily J Knight; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Inhibition of return in the visual field: the eccentricity effect is independent of cortical magnification.

Authors:  Yan Bao; Quan Lei; Yuan Fang; Yu Tong; Kerstin Schill; Ernst Pöppel; Hans Strasburger
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2013

7.  The retinal and perceived locus of fixation in the human visual system.

Authors:  Markku Kilpeläinen; Nicole M Putnam; Kavitha Ratnam; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Luminance gradient at object borders communicates object location to the human oculomotor system.

Authors:  Markku Kilpeläinen; Mark A Georgeson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Scotoma Simulation in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Sascha Klee; Dietmar Link; Stefan Sinzinger; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.973

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.