Literature DB >> 7848980

Sex differences in the left and right hemifields of normal subjects with computerised static perimetry.

H Cohn1, M DeAgostini, D Aron-Rosa, L Laloum, F Boller.   

Abstract

Results of routine perimetric testing of the left and right hemifields in normal subjects have been assumed to be symmetric although asymmetry due to hemispheric dominance has been established for other psychophysical tests. These asymmetries have sometimes been related to sex. With the advent of computerised static perimetry, subtle differences between the left and the right hemifields might be found that were not obvious before. This study investigated differences in retinal sensitivity between the hemifields and the role of sex and eye dominance. Forty three unequivocally right handed and right eye dominant normal adult volunteers, 24 females and 19 males, underwent Humphrey 24-2 testing, half beginning with the left eye, the other half with the right eye. The Peridata program was used to calculate decibel totals per hemifield. Four subjects were excluded because of poor cooperation or test artefacts. In females, the total of the left hemifield was significantly less than the right (p < 0.01) by a mean 18.2 (SD 24) dB equivalent to a difference of 0.34 dB per tested point. No significant difference in hemifields was found for males, between the sexes for both eyes combined, or between the two eyes for either sex. It was concluded that asymmetries in retinal sensitivity with respect to the vertical axis may be physiological and found in females, but not in males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7848980      PMCID: PMC504968          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.78.11.837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  13 in total

1.  Hemispheric differences in the perception of lightness.

Authors:  J B Davidoff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  A sex difference in effect of temporallobe neurosurgery on design preference.

Authors:  H LANSDELL
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Measuring handedness with questionnaires.

Authors:  M P Bryden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Opposite superiorities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres in discriminative reaction time to physiognomical and alphabetical material.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; C Umiltà; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum.

Authors:  C DeLacoste-Utamsing; R L Holloway
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Sex differences in brain organization for verbal and non-verbal functions.

Authors:  D Kimura; R A Harshman
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Hemispheric dominance and normal color memory.

Authors:  D R Malone; H J Hannay
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Visual field differences in verbal tasks: effects of task familiarity and sex of subject.

Authors:  J L Bradshaw; E A Gates
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Functional dissociation of the hemispheres using foveal visual input.

Authors:  F Haun
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Human brain: left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region.

Authors:  N Geschwind; W Levitsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Two Different OCT Systems: Retina Layer Segmentation and Impact on Structure-Function Analysis in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Livia M Brandao; Anna A Ledolter; Andreas Schötzau; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Wavelet decomposition analysis in the two-flash multifocal ERG in early glaucoma: a comparison to ganglion cell analysis and visual field.

Authors:  Livia M Brandao; Matthias Monhart; Andreas Schötzau; Anna A Ledolter; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.