Literature DB >> 7848226

Risk factors for wound infection following caesarean section.

P G Beattie1, T R Rings, M F Hunter, Y Lake.   

Abstract

A prospective study was performed between April 1, 1991 and April 30, 1992 to determine factors involved in the development of post-Caesarean section wound infection. During this period there were 4,857 deliveries, 428 by Caesarean section (8.8%). Complete data were available on 328 (76.6%) patients. Wound infection occurred in 25.3% of women and was confirmed by positive bacteriology in 77.1%; 36% of wound infections were diagnosed following the patients' discharge from hospital. A negative correlation was found between maternal age and development of wound infection up to age 40 (p = 0.03). Maternal weight was a highly significant indicator of subsequent wound infection development (p = 0.0001), the relationship between increasing maternal weight and infection appearing linear. Antibiotic prophylaxis was found to be the most significant protective factor (p = 0.0007) in the reduction of postoperative wound infection. This relationship was independent of maternal weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7848226     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1994.tb01256.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  14 in total

1.  Caesarean sections at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital: A three year review.

Authors:  Mariam Mathew; Radha Kumari; Vlasta Vaclavinkova; Andrzej Krolikowski
Journal:  J Sci Res Med Sci       Date:  2002-04

Review 2.  Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section.

Authors:  R F Lamont; J D Sobel; J P Kusanovic; E Vaisbuch; S Mazaki-Tovi; S K Kim; N Uldbjerg; R Romero
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 3.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Rosalie M Grivell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

5.  Maternal sepsis: a Scottish population-based case-control study.

Authors:  C D Acosta; S Bhattacharya; D Tuffnell; J J Kurinczuk; M Knight
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Incidence and predictors of surgical site infections following caesarean sections at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania.

Authors:  Filbert J Mpogoro; Stephen E Mshana; Mariam M Mirambo; Benson R Kidenya; Balthazar Gumodoka; Can Imirzalioglu
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 4.887

7.  Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Khalid B M Saeed; Richard A Greene; Paul Corcoran; Sinéad M O'Neill
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Incidence and risk factors for caesarean wound infection in Lagos Nigeria.

Authors:  Oliver C Ezechi; Asuquo Edet; Hakim Akinlade; Chidinma V Gab-Okafor; Ebiere Herbertson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-09-22

9.  Surgical-site Infection Following Cesarean Section in Kano, Nigeria.

Authors:  Ta Jido; Id Garba
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2012-01

10.  Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section.

Authors:  Fathia E Al Jama
Journal:  Qatar Med J       Date:  2013-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.