Literature DB >> 7847466

The nature of life in the history of medical and philosophic thinking.

G Federspil1, N Sicolo.   

Abstract

The vitalistic doctrine of Aristotle and Galen, in which the soul is an indissoluble part of the body, was undisputed throughout most of the Middle Ages. The first radical change came with Telesio, who developed philosophic naturalism in which the soul has a reality of its own, though it is connected to the body. The definitive change came with Descartes, who believed that all biologic phenomena can be explained by the laws of mechanics, and only man is distinguished by the possession of a soul. For the next 300 years, this mechanistic view would be challenged by a new vitalism, in which the 'vital force' has an existence in its own right.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7847466     DOI: 10.1159/000168745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nephrol        ISSN: 0250-8095            Impact factor:   3.754


  3 in total

1.  Vitalism-A Worldview Revisited: A Critique Of Vitalism And Its Implications For Integrative Medicine.

Authors:  Ian Coulter; Pamela Snider; Amy Neil
Journal:  Integr Med (Encinitas)       Date:  2019-06

2.  A Vitalism Ethos and the Chiropractic Health Care Paradigm.

Authors:  John T Thornhill
Journal:  J Chiropr Humanit       Date:  2020-12-07

3.  Paradigm-Specific Risk Conceptions, Patient Safety, and the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practitioners: The Case of Homeopathy in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Nadine Ijaz
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2020-01-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.