Literature DB >> 7847368

Response to treatment in hereditary metabolic disease: 1993 survey and 10-year comparison.

E Treacy1, B Childs, C R Scriver.   

Abstract

Knowledge about cause, pathogenesis, and manifestations of hereditary metabolic diseases puts them among the best known of all human diseases. On the other hand, outcomes of treatment are cause for uncertainty and concern. In 1985, Hayes et al. analyzed efficacy of treatment up to 1983 in 65 of these diseases selected randomly from the McKusick catalogs. Disease scores were calculated for seven parameters: longevity; reproductive capability; somatic and cognitive development; and handicaps affecting schooling, work, and cosmetic appearance. Scores of the untreated and treated phenotypes were then compared. We have now measured progress over the past decade by calculating scores on the same 65 diseases from data in several hundred new reports published since 1983. All seven parameters in the 1993 survey reflect improved efficacy of treatment in the 10-year interval. However, the percent of diseases for which all manifestations of the disease were removed by treatment has not changed (12% in 1983; 12% in 1993). The group in which manifestations were untouched by treatment has become smaller (48% in 1983; 31% in 1993), and the group partially ameliorated by treatment had increased reciprocally (40% in 1983; 57% in 1993). Progress in the treatment of hereditary metabolic disease is thus better than it was, but it is still only a partial success. The advances are attributable to greater success with organ and tissue transplantation, better pharmacotherapy, and better support systems. Restoration of normal homeostasis, the key to successful treatment, remains an elusive challenge and is a logical, major focus for research in human genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7847368      PMCID: PMC1801128     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  25 in total

1.  Transplantation--a new dimension for paediatrics.

Authors:  C Chantler
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Persistent acitrullinemia after liver transplantation for carbamylphosphate synthetase deficiency.

Authors:  M Tuchman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Liver transplantation for type IV glycogen storage disease.

Authors:  R Selby; T E Starzl; E Yunis; B I Brown; R S Kendall; A Tzakis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Biotechnology regulation.

Authors:  P L Bereano
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Cognitive development in children with inborn errors of urea synthesis.

Authors:  M Msall; P S Monahan; N Chapanis; M L Batshaw
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Jpn       Date:  1988-08

Review 6.  Treatment of inherited disease: realized and potential.

Authors:  C R Scriver
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.456

7.  Changes in life-style after liver transplantation.

Authors:  B J Zitelli; J W Miller; J C Gartner; J J Malatack; A H Urbach; S H Belle; L Williams; B Kirkpatrick; T E Starzl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  The effect of Mendelian disease on human health: a measurement.

Authors:  T Costa; C R Scriver; B Childs
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1985-06

9.  The effect of Mendelian disease on human health. II: Response to treatment.

Authors:  A Hayes; T Costa; C R Scriver; B Childs
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1985-06

Review 10.  The application of bone marrow transplantation to the treatment of genetic diseases.

Authors:  R Parkman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  3 in total

1.  2001 ASHG Award for Excellence in Education. Introductory speech for Charles Scriver.

Authors:  David Valle
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-04       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Genetic screening, testing and treatment: how far can we go?

Authors:  C R Scriver
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 3.  Genetic testing and public policy.

Authors:  N A Holtzman; D Shapiro
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.