Literature DB >> 7847276

The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty.

L DeGuzman1, D Bahiraei, K W Vig, P S Vig, R J Weyant, K O'Brien.   

Abstract

The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index is a British occlusal index that measures the severity of dental malocclusion and has been used in several investigations that have evaluated the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment provision in Europe. As part of its development, the PAR index was validated for malocclusion severity, by using the opinions of a panel of 74 dentists and orthodontists. The present investigation was carried out to validate the PAR index, by using the opinion of an American panel of orthodontists. Eleven orthodontists examined a sample of 200 sets of study casts and rated them for malocclusion severity and perceived treatment difficulty. Multiple regression techniques were used to evaluate the predictive power of the components of malocclusion on the panel's scores. Weightings were calculated from the partial regression coefficients and, when these weightings were applied to the PAR index, the association between the panel's opinion and the PAR index scores was increased.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7847276     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70133-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  25 in total

1.  Retrospective evaluation of the outcome of orthodontic treatment in adults.

Authors:  T Riedmann; R Berg
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Evaluation of orthodontic treatment success in patients with pronounced Angle Class III.

Authors:  R Angermann; R Berg
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparison of early treatment outcomes rendered in three different types of malocclusions.

Authors:  Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; He-Kyong Kang; Archana Dhawan; Riyad Al-Qawasmi; Rafael Rocha Pacheco
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Influence of single-jaw surgery vs bimaxillary surgery on the outcome and duration of combined orthodontic-surgical treatment.

Authors:  Ian Arad; Jasveer Jandu; Paul Bassett; Padhraig S Fleming
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Measuring orthodontic treatment satisfaction: questionnaire development and preliminary validation.

Authors:  M E Bennett; J F Tulloch; K W Vig; C L Phillips
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.821

6.  What can be achieved with removable orthodontic appliances?

Authors:  Rainer-Reginald Miethke; Claudia Wronski
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions using a completely customized lingual appliance and the Herbst device.

Authors:  Julius Vu; Hans Pancherz; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Posttreatment and physiologic occlusal changes comparison.

Authors:  Karina Maria S Freitas; Guilherme Janson; Bryan Tompson; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Tassiana Mesquita Simão; Fabrício Pinelli Valarelli; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index as an Alternative for Orthodontic Treatment Need Decision in Relation to Angle Classification.

Authors:  Lale Taner; Fatma Deniz Uzuner; Yağmur Çaylak; Zeynep Gençtürk; Emine Kaygısız
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-03-01

10.  Impact of Orthodontic Treatment Complexity on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Turkish Patients: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Hatice Kübra Olkun; Gülşilay Sayar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.