Literature DB >> 7846423

On the development of the Medical Research Council trial of alpha-interferon in metastatic renal carcinoma. Urological Working Party Renal Carcinoma Subgroup.

P M Fayers1, P A Cook, D Machin, N Donaldson, J Whitehead, A Ritchie, R T Oliver, P Yuen.   

Abstract

This paper describes the steps taken by the British Medical Research Council (MRC) in developing the MRC RE01 trial, a randomized clinical trial for patients with metastatic renal cancer; we discuss the reasons for adopting a triangular sequential design and the impact that this has upon the monitoring of the trial. It had been suggested to the MRC that a trial of biological agents for metastatic renal carcinoma should be initiated. The Cancer Therapy Committee (CTC) of the MRC, through its associated site specific working parties, is responsible for designing and co-ordinating randomized trials of alternative treatments in cancer in solid tumours. Since no MRC working party for renal carcinoma existed at that time, development began by the formation of an ad hoc group set up under the auspices of the CTC. They assessed, by means of a postal questionnaire, U.K. interest in the trials of, and modalities utilized for, treatment of renal cancer. The responses focused attention on the important questions to ask and indicated the level of potential collaboration. These responses and related clinical and statistical issues suggested a protocol to compare medroxy-progesterone acetate (MPA) against alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN). In view of the special problems of comparing an expensive and potentially toxic therapy with an inexpensive and non-toxic standard, a sequential design was used rather than a fixed sample size design. Statistical issues raised and solutions provided are described. The method of establishing the trial data monitoring committee and a brief review of mortality from renal carcinoma in England and Wales are also included. The trial opened to patient recruitment on 1 January 1992. The formal statements regarding statistical issues that appear in the formal trial protocol (RE01) are set out in the Appendix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7846423     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780132106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

1.  Cautionary tales of survival analysis: conflicting analyses from a clinical trial in breast cancer.

Authors:  W M Gregory; K Bolland; J Whitehead; R L Souhami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 2.  Are cytokine responses in renal cell cancer the product of placebo effect of treatment or true biotherapy? What trials are needed now?

Authors:  R T Oliver
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  Sample size: how many patients are necessary?

Authors:  P M Fayers; D Machin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Dual role of WNT5A in promoting endothelial differentiation of glioma stem cells and angiogenesis of glioma derived endothelial cells.

Authors:  Taoliang Chen; Fabing Zhang; Jie Liu; Zhilin Huang; Yaofeng Zheng; Shaokang Deng; Yang Liu; Jihui Wang; Xinlin Sun
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 9.867

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.