Literature DB >> 7846317

A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit.

A S Alhakami1, P Slovic.   

Abstract

Judgments of risk and judgments of benefit have been found to be inversely related. Activities or technologies that are judged high in risk tend to be judged low in benefit, and vice versa. In the present study, we examine this inverse relationship in detail, using two measures of relationship between risk and benefit. We find that the inverse relationship is robust and indicative of a confounding of risk and benefit in people's minds. This confounding is linked to a person's overall evaluation of an activity or technology. Theoretical and practical implications of this risk-benefit confounding are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7846317     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  51 in total

1.  Trends in public perceptions of electronic health records during early years of meaningful use.

Authors:  Jessica S Ancker; Samantha Brenner; Joshua E Richardson; Michael Silver; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Risk Taking Under the Influence: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Emotion in Adolescence.

Authors:  Susan E Rivers; Valerie F Reyna; Britain Mills
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2008-03

3.  Performing a secondary executive task with affective stimuli interferes with decision making under risk conditions.

Authors:  Bettina Gathmann; Mirko Pawlikowski; Tobias Schöler; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-10-24

4.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Christian E H Beaudrie; Joseph Conti; Barbara Herr Harthorn
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Perceiving land-degrading activities from the lay perspective in northern China.

Authors:  Harry F Lee; David D Zhang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  The Role of Risk Perception in Flu Vaccine Behavior among African-American and White Adults in the United States.

Authors:  Vicki S Freimuth; Amelia Jamison; Gregory Hancock; Donald Musa; Karen Hilyard; Sandra Crouse Quinn
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Surrogate and patient discrepancy regarding consent for critical care research.

Authors:  Julia T Newman; Alexandra Smart; Tyler R Reese; Andre Williams; Marc Moss
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Environmental injustice and flood risk: A conceptual model and case comparison of metropolitan Miami and Houston, USA.

Authors:  Timothy W Collins; Sara E Grineski; Jayajit Chakraborty
Journal:  Reg Environ Change       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.678

9.  A prospective audit on the validity of written informed consent prior to glaucoma surgery: an Asian perspective.

Authors:  Kui Dong Kang; Aman Shah B Abdul Majid; Jee Hyun Kwag; Yeon Deok Kim; Hye Bin Yim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology.

Authors:  Johannes Simons; René Zimmer; Carl Vierboom; Ingo Härlen; Rolf Hertel; Gaby-Fleur Böl
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.