Literature DB >> 7844129

Atrophy of the proximal part of the femur after total hip arthroplasty without cement. A quantitative comparison of cobalt-chromium and titanium femoral stems with use of dual x-ray absorptiometry.

S S Hughes1, J P Furia, P Smith, V D Pellegrini.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the density of periprosthetic bone about titanium and cobalt-chromium stems that had been inserted without cement. The analysis was done, three to four years after a total hip arthroplasty, in a retrospectively matched cohort of thirty patients. Fifteen patients had a stem that was collarless, proximally coated, and made of titanium; the other fifteen had a stem of similar design that was made of cobalt-chromium. The criteria for selection in the study included an excellent clinical and radiographic result and separately calculated modified Harris and Mayo hip scores of more than 94 points. All stems had radiographic evidence of osseous ingrowth. A comparison of the bone-mineral density about the two different types of stem with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry revealed a significant difference only along the calcar of the femur. There was no significant difference about the remaining, preponderant portion of the proximal part of the femur. Our data suggest that the difference in the modulus of elasticity between the two types of stem had little effect on the loss of bone-mineral density in most of the proximal part of the femur after arthroplasty without cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7844129     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199502000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Long-term periprosthetic remodeling in THA shows structural preservation.

Authors:  James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Proximally versus fully porous-coated femoral stems: a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Steven J MacDonald; Seth Rosenzweig; Jeffrey S Guerin; Richard W McCalden; Eric R Bohm; Robert B Bourne; Cecil H Rorabeck; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Proximal cement fixation in total hip arthroplasty--first results with a new stem design.

Authors:  Thomas Einsiedel; Florian Gebhard; Ilaria Bregolato; Anja Hiemeier; Lothar Kinzl; Markus Schultheiss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Periprosthetic mineralization changes around femoral stems: a prospective 12-month study with DEXA.

Authors:  Marco Galli; Antonio Leone; Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli; Tommaso Pirronti; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty in treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Michał Pyda; Bogdan Koczy; Wojciech Widuchowski; Małgorzata Widuchowska; Tomasz Stołtny; Michał Mielnik; Jacek Hermanson
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-01-25

6.  Quantitating the effect of prosthesis design on femoral remodeling using high-resolution region-free densitometric analysis (DXA-RFA).

Authors:  Mohsen Farzi; Richard M Morris; Jeannette Penny; Lang Yang; Jose M Pozo; Søren Overgaard; Alejandro F Frangi; Jeremy Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis: 22 hips followed for a mean of 6 years.

Authors:  Per Y Adolphson; Mats O F Salemyr; Olof G Sköldenberg; Henrik S G Bodén
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.