Literature DB >> 7843513

'Baby Check' in the inner city--use and value to parents.

J Kai1.   

Abstract

'Baby Check', an information booklet designed to aid assessment of acutely ill babies, was given to a group of socioeconomically disadvantaged families from one inner city general practice. Parents' perceptions and use of the booklet were explored in a qualitative study based on audiotaped interviews with 42 parents of 34 babies under 6 months old. Most families (26) used Baby Check spontaneously. Parents found that Baby Check was helpful, reduced anxiety and increased confidence coping with illness, seeking medical advice and communicating with doctors. Parents experienced some difficulties, e.g. they had concerns about a check for rectal temperature and they sought more information and advice about common illnesses. Parents valued and were empowered by access to 'medical' information. Further evaluation and consultation with parents is required to ensure that information is relevant to their needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7843513     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/11.3.245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  5 in total

1.  Randomised controlled trial of effect of Baby Check on use of health services in first 6 months of life.

Authors:  H Thomson; S Ross; P Wilson; A McConnachie; R Watson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-26

2.  Helping parents identify severe illnesses in their children.

Authors:  D Jewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-26

3.  Parents' difficulties and information needs in coping with acute illness in preschool children: a qualitative study.

Authors:  J Kai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-19

4.  Differentiating minor from serious illness in infants.

Authors:  C Magenis; M Cupples; T Bradley; G Murphy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Information resources to aid parental decision-making on when to seek medical care for their acutely sick child: a narrative systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Neill; Damian Roland; Caroline H D Jones; Matthew Thompson; Monica Lakhanpaul
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.