Literature DB >> 7842831

Family System Test (FAST): are parents' and children's family constructs either different or similar, or both?

T M Gehring1, D Marti, A Sidler.   

Abstract

Perceptions of family cohesion and hierarchy structures were assessed by the Family System Test (FAST), a clinically-derived figure placement technique. Parents (N = 140) and their preadolescent offspring (N = 70) completed typical and conflict representations in individual as well as group settings. Typical representations were characterized by balanced family structures (i.e. cohesive and moderately hierarchical) and those displaying conflict situations showed predominantly unbalanced patterns. FAST portrayals were related to respondent (mother vs. father vs. child). Fathers represented typical family relations as balanced more often than mothers. Regarding conflict representations, children were more likely than fathers to portray the family as unbalanced. However, analyses of representations of the same family (i.e. intra-family comparisons) indicated that all respondents differed in their perceptions and, that fathers' typical portrayals showed most often the same structure as those done by the family members as a group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7842831     DOI: 10.1007/bf02253291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev        ISSN: 0009-398X


  31 in total

Review 1.  The importance of similarity in the marital relationship.

Authors:  J E Deal; K S Wampler; C F Halverson
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  1992-12

2.  Evaluating FACES III and the Circumplex Model: 2,440 families.

Authors:  R G Green; R N Harris; J A Forte; M Robinson
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  1991-03

3.  Is there a relationship between children's mental disorders and their ideal family constructs?

Authors:  D Marti; T M Gehring
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  Circumplex Model VII: validation studies and FACES III.

Authors:  D H Olson
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  1986-09

5.  Multiple perspectives on family relationships: a latent variables model.

Authors:  W L Cook; M J Goldstein
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1993-10

Review 6.  Families and individual development: provocations from the field of family therapy.

Authors:  P Minuchin
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1985-04

7.  Socio-psychosomatic dysfunctions: a case study.

Authors:  T M Gehring
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  1985

8.  A factor analysis of self-report measures of family functioning.

Authors:  B L Bloom
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  1985-06

9.  FACES III and the Kvebaek Family Sculpture Technique as measures of cohesion and closeness.

Authors:  I H Vandvik; G F Eckblad
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  1993-06

10.  Parent and child views of parent-child relationship qualities and resilient outcomes among urban children.

Authors:  P A Gribble; E L Cowen; P A Wyman; W C Work; M Wannon; A Raoof
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 8.982

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accuracy of Retrospective Reports of Family Environment.

Authors:  David C Bell; Linda G Bell
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2017-11-09

2.  Family System Test (FAST): the relevance of parental family constructs for clinical intervention.

Authors:  T M Gehring; M Candrian; D Marti; O R del Sarte
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  1996
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.