Literature DB >> 7842828

Teicoplanin plus pefloxacine versus teicoplanin plus netilmicin in empiric therapy of febrile patients with cancer and neutropenia. A randomized study of two once daily regimens in patients with previously inserted catheters.

M Studená1, E Hlavácová, L Hel'pianska, A Vonkomerová, J Lacka, V Studená, E Kukucková, T Kollár, P Pichna, T Sálek.   

Abstract

In a comparative randomized trial, teicoplanin 5 mg/kg plus either netilmicin 5 mg/kg or pefloxacine 10 mg/kg was administered in a once daily empiric therapy to 40 cancer patients with fever and neutropenia after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Both regimens were analyzed with respect to the localisation of the underlying disease, catheter presence and agents isolated from blood culture. The cure and improvement rate were 80% (teicoplanin plus netilmicin) and 85% (teicoplanin plus pefloxacin), with no statistically significant difference between the groups. Teicoplanin with either an aminoglycoside or a quinolone administered once daily seems to be a suitable approach in empiric therapy for fever in neutropenia and may prevent catheter insertion in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7842828     DOI: 10.1159/000239304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemotherapy        ISSN: 0009-3157            Impact factor:   2.544


  3 in total

Review 1.  A survey of the use of teicoplanin in patients with haematological malignancies and solid tumours.

Authors:  J M Davies
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Anti-gram-positive agents. What we have and what we would like.

Authors:  R N Grüneberg
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  The use of quinolones as therapy in granulocytopenic cancer patients. Comparison with other antimicrobials.

Authors:  V Krcméry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.