Literature DB >> 7842783

Outcome of patients cared for in a ventilator-dependent unit in a general hospital.

D R Gracey1, J M Naessens, R W Viggiano, G E Koenig, M D Silverstein, R D Hubmayr.   

Abstract

We describe our initial experience with the admission of 129 patients for 132 episodes of ventilator-dependence to a self-contained ventilator-dependent unit (VDU) in a general hospital and present a survival comparison between VDU patients and a historic control population from the same institution. Forty-three patients were screened and denied admission to the VDU because long-term ventilator dependence was not felt to be a probable outcome (56%); they were medically unstable, often requiring electrocardiographic monitoring (19%), they had poor rehabilitation potential because of markedly depressed mental status (13%), or they preferred to be treated closer to their homes (12%). Thirteen (9.8%) of the VDU patients died in the hospital compared to 44 (42%) in the historic control group. After exclusion of patients with multiorgan failure (who made up 26% of the control group) and using a proportional hazard model to adjust for group differences in age and disease class, the difference in hospital mortality remained highly significant (p < or = 0.01). Ninety-one of the 119 VDU patients (77%) were ultimately able to return home; 16 (13%) continued to use a ventilator intermittently at night; 26 patients (22%) were permanently placed in nursing homes, all off of the ventilator. Overall, 88% of the 119 patients discharged had been liberated from mechanical ventilation. Ninety-seven (82%) and 86 (72%) remain alive 1 and 2 years after discharge, respectively. Some of the survival benefits may be directly attributed to the VDU. Others reflect a change in treatment philosophy, which was nevertheless reinforced by our VDU experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7842783     DOI: 10.1378/chest.107.2.494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

1.  [Application of a sponaneous ventilation protocol. Experiences from a weaning center for neurological diseases].

Authors:  F Oehmichen; K Zäumer; M Ragaller; J Mehrholz; M Pohl
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Outcomes, cost and long term survival of patients referred to a regional weaning centre.

Authors:  D V Pilcher; M J Bailey; D F Treacher; S Hamid; A J Williams; A C Davidson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Survival in Patients Receiving Prolonged Ventilation: Factors that Influence Outcome.

Authors:  A James Mamary; Shrikant Kondapaneni; Gwendolyn B Vance; John P Gaughan; Ubaldo J Martin; Gerard J Criner
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med       Date:  2011-04-25

4.  The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Elisa Estenssoro; Rosa Reina; Héctor S Canales; María Gabriela Saenz; Francisco E Gonzalez; María M Aprea; Enrique Laffaire; Victor Gola; Arnaldo Dubin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  How prolonged mechanical ventilation is a neglected disease in chest medicine: a study of prolonged mechanical ventilation based on 6 years of experience in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chienhsiu Huang
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.