Literature DB >> 7840701

Mechanical circulatory support: the Bad Oeynhausen experience.

R Körfer1, A el-Banayosy, H Posival, K Minami, M M Körner, L Arusoglu, T Breymann, L Kizner, D Seifert, H Körtke.   

Abstract

From September 1987 to February 1994, we treated 147 patients ranging between 11 and 82 years old with different mechanical circulatory support systems. The applied devices were the Bio-Medicus centrifugal pump in 61 patients, the Abiomed BVS System 5000 in 49 patients, the Thoratec ventricular assist device in 42 patients, and the Novacor left ventricular assist device in 7 patients. On the basis of indication for mechanical circulatory support, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1 consisted of 72 patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock; group 2, 50 patients in whom mechanical support was used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation; and group 3 (miscellaneous), 25 patients in cardiogenic shock resulting from acute myocardial infarction (n = 14), acute fulminant myocarditis (n = 3), primary graft failure (n = 2), right heart failure after heart transplantation (n = 3), and acute rejection (n = 3). Time of support ranged from 1 hour to 97 days (mean duration, 10.8 days). Seventy-five patients (51%) were discharged from the hospital. The best survival rate was achieved in group 2 with 72%, followed by group 1 with 44% and then group 3 with 28%. The most frequent complications in group 1 were bleeding (44%), multiple-organ failure (24%), neurologic disorders (18%), and acute renal failure (15%). In group 2, the major complications were bleeding (34%) and cerebrovascular disorders (22%) and in group 3, multiple-organ failure and sepsis (60%) and bleeding (32%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7840701     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)00913-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  [Microcirculation of kidney and skin during left ventricular assisted circulation--comparative studies of pulsatile and nonpulsatile assists].

Authors:  A Sezai; M Shiono; Y Orime; K Nakata; M Hata; M Iida; M Nemoto; T Kohjima; Y Sezai; Y Taniguchi
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-12

Review 2.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2008-09

4.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices: new deus ex machina?

Authors:  Diego Arroyo; Stéphane Cook
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2011-07-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.