Literature DB >> 7840658

Effect of iron acquisition on induction of DNA single-strand breaks by erionite, a carcinogenic mineral fiber.

S K Eborn1, A E Aust.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that iron from inhaled fibers, such as asbestos, is responsible for their toxicity and carcinogenicity. The natural fibrous zeolite erionite is far more carcinogenic than asbestos, but contains little or no iron. Fibers that persist in the lung accumulate iron on their surfaces. The ability of erionite to induce formation of single-strand breaks in phi X174 RFI DNA was investigated before and after binding of iron. Unmodified erionite did not induce DNA single-strand breaks with or without ascorbate and/or the iron chelator EDTA. When erionite (1 mg/ml) was suspended in 25, 50, 100, or 500 microM FeCl2, it readily bound iron (25, 50, 93, or 176 nmol Fe/mg, respectively, in 1 h), apparently through ion exchange. When erionite was suspended in FeCl3 at identical concentrations for 1 h, it also bound iron (24, 46, 89, or 239 nmol Fe/mg). The ferric iron did not appear to bind primarily through ion exchange, but appeared to be deposited on the surface, probably in the form of hydroxides/oxyhydroxides. When ferrous iron was bound to erionite, single-strand breaks in DNA were induced in the absence of ascorbate, but when ferric iron was bound, DNA single-strand breaks were observed only in the presence of ascorbate. When EDTA or citrate was added, this activity increased with the amount of iron mobilized from the fiber. If iron acquired by erionite in vivo is similarly mobilized, it may damage biomolecules throughout the cell, including DNA. This may explain the toxicity and carcinogenicity of erionite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7840658     DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1995.1067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 0003-9861            Impact factor:   4.013


  7 in total

Review 1.  In vitro experimental models of mesothelioma revisited.

Authors:  Anand Singh; Nathanael Pruett; Chuong D Hoang
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Biopersistence and potential adverse health impacts of fibrous nanomaterials: what have we learned from asbestos?

Authors:  Vanesa C Sanchez; Jodie R Pietruska; Nathan R Miselis; Robert H Hurt; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Morphological and chemical mechanisms of elongated mineral particle toxicities.

Authors:  Ann E Aust; Philip M Cook; Ronald F Dodson
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

4.  Analysis of the biological and chemical reactivity of zeolite-based aluminosilicate fibers and particulates.

Authors:  Estelle Fach; W James Waldman; Marshall Williams; John Long; Richard K Meister; Prabir K Dutta
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Where is iron in erionite? A multidisciplinary study on fibrous erionite-Na from Jersey (Nevada, USA).

Authors:  Alessandro F Gualtieri; Nicola Bursi Gandolfi; Simone Pollastri; Kilian Pollok; Falko Langenhorst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The mechanism of iron binding processes in erionite fibres.

Authors:  Alessandro Pacella; Carlo Cremisini; Elisa Nardi; Maria Rita Montereali; Ida Pettiti; Paolo Ballirano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A Deep Look Into Erionite Fibres: an Electron Microscopy Investigation of their Self-Assembly.

Authors:  Roberto Matassa; Giuseppe Familiari; Michela Relucenti; Ezio Battaglione; Clive Downing; Alessandro Pacella; Georgia Cametti; Paolo Ballirano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.