Literature DB >> 7840389

Is simultaneous hepatectomy and intestinal anastomosis safe?

D Elias1, B Detroz, P Lasser, B Plaud, G Jerbi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the safety of simultaneous, "one-stage," hepatectomy and intestinal anastomosis, we retrospectively studied 53 patients who underwent such a procedure, with 76 digestive tract sutures. They represented 80% of all the cases eligible for one-stage procedures among 332 liver resections for malignant tumors.
METHODS: The medical records of the patients were retrospectively analyzed to assess details of the surgical procedures, postoperative mortality and morbidity, and postoperative liver function, with special attention being paid to the prothrombin time and the bilirubin value on days 1, 2, 3, and 7.
RESULTS: No postoperative mortality occurred and the postoperative morbidity rate was 19%. Only 2 cases of digestive tract anastomotic leakage occurred, which led to reoperation. Hepatectomy-related complications were noted in 5 patients (3 biliary fistulas, 1 hemorrhage and 1 transient liver failure), and pulmonary infections occurred 3 times. The technical difficulties of the one-stage procedure are discussed, focusing on the choice of the incision, the risk of sepsis for the liver if there is an intestinal aperture, possible repercussions of liver impairment and hepatic pedicle clamping on bowel suture healing, and the risk of digestive fistula according to the location of the bowel suture.
CONCLUSION: It appears that this one-stage procedure is safe if the bowel is systematically cleaned before the operation, if an appropriate Rio-Branco incision is used, and if the risk of postoperative liver failure is low. It seems preferable to use intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping rather than continuous clamping (when feasible), and to temporarily protect a low rectal anastomosis with a colostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7840389     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80146-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  26 in total

1.  Short-term and long-term outcomes after simultaneous resection of colorectal malignancies and synchronous liver metastases.

Authors:  Eduardo de Santibañes; Diego Fernandez; Carlos Vaccaro; Guillermo Ojea Quintana; Fernando Bonadeo; Juan Pekolj; Carlos Bonofiglio; Ernesto Molmenti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumor and liver metastases: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Hadrien Tranchart; David Fuks; Luca Vigano; Stefano Ferretti; François Paye; Go Wakabayashi; Alessandro Ferrero; Brice Gayet; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Yanxin Luo; Lei Wang; Chuangqi Chen; Dianke Chen; Meijin Huang; Yihua Huang; Junsheng Peng; Ping Lan; Ji Cui; Shirong Cai; Jianping Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Primary Tumor and Liver Metastases: Results of a Multicenter International Study.

Authors:  Stefano Ferretti; Hadrien Tranchart; Joseph F Buell; Constantino Eretta; Alberto Patriti; Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato; Jung Wook Huh; Luca Vigano; Ho Seong Han; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Elio Jovine; Thomas Clark Gamblin; Giulio Belli; Go Wakabayashi; Brice Gayet; Ibrahim Dagher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Minimally invasive sequential treatment of synchronous colorectal liver metastases by laparoscopic colectomy and robotic right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Alessandro Giacomoni; Andrea Coratti; Pietro Addeo; Francesco Maria Bianco
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and associated liver metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  R M Lupinacci; W Andraus; L B De Paiva Haddad; L A Carneiro D' Albuquerque; P Herman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open colorectal resections for patients undergoing simultaneous R0 resection for liver metastases.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Yang Seok Koh; Hyeong Rok Kim; Chol Kyoon Cho; Young Jin Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Intermittent clamping of the hepatic pedicle in simultaneous ultrasonography-guided liver resection and colorectal resection with intestinal anastomosis: is it safe?

Authors:  Emilio De Raffele; Mariateresa Mirarchi; Samuele Vaccari; Dajana Cuicchi; Ferdinando Lecce; Barbara Dalla Via; Bruno Cola
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Surgical approaches of resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases: timing considerations.

Authors:  Ioannis Vassiliou; Nick Arkadopoulos; Theodosios Theodosopoulos; Georgios Fragulidis; Athanasios Marinis; Agathi Kondi-Paphiti; Lazaros Samanides; Andreas Polydorou; Constantinos Gennatas; Dionysios Voros; Vassilios Smyrniotis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Survival of patients with synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastases--is there a difference?

Authors:  Maximilian Bockhorn; Andreja Frilling; Nils R Frühauf; Jan Neuhaus; Ernesto Molmenti; Tanja Trarbach; Massimo Malagó; Hauke Lang; Christoph E Broelsch
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.