Literature DB >> 7840380

Benefits of pulmonary artery catheter and transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients with cardiac disease.

C A Portera1, R P Compton, D N Walters, I W Browder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because the abdominal insufflation and desufflation associated with laparoscopic procedures may adversely effect a compromised myocardium, patients with significant cardiopulmonary disease should be closely monitored during these procedures. The utility of intraoperative pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) monitoring was studied in 10 patients with moderate to severe cardiopulmonary disease to identify patients at greatest risk for cardiovascular complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Ten patients were enrolled in this prospective study; 7 had suffered a previous myocardial infarction, 6 had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting, and 9 had disease classified as Goldman's class II or greater. The heart was monitored by TEE throughout the laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using real-time, two-dimensional mode to study the wall thickness and motion. Several PAC measurements were taken directly: cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, and central venous pressure. Heart rate and blood pressure were also obtained at corresponding intervals. Cardiac index, stroke volume, and left and right ventricular stroke work were then calculated.
RESULTS: TEE demonstrated no significant changes in ventricular wall motion throughout laparoscopy. In patients who had postoperative cardiovascular complications, significant changes in cardiac index, left ventricular stroke work, and stroke volume were seen after pneumoperitoneum release. Compared to that of patients who did not develop complications, the cardiac index in those with complications dropped 42% (3.10 +/- 0.72 versus 1.80 +/- 0.10 L/min per m2, respectively; P < 0.01); left ventricular stroke work dropped 64% (139.00 +/- 11.36 versus 50.38 +/- 10.55 g x min/beat, respectively; P < 0.01); and stroke volume dropped 51% (86.90 +/- 12.68 versus 42.50 +/- 5.08 mL/beat, respectively; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: PCA monitoring in patients with compromised cardiac function is useful in identifying patients who may not tolerate hemodynamic changes after pneumoperitoneum release. Normalization of hemodynamic changes secondary to abdominal insufflation and desufflation in patients with compromised hearts may not occur in patients with compromised hearts may not occur for hours postoperatively. Abnormal hemodynamic changes occur within the first hour after desufflation in patients who later develop cardiovascular complications, which are heralded by significant drops in left ventricular stroke work, cardiac index, and stroke volume. TEE did not prove to be useful for intraoperative monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7840380     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80137-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  To cut is not always to cure.

Authors:  V Shayani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Enhances Gastrointestinal Recovery after Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marcell Virág; Máté Rottler; Noémi Gede; Klementina Ocskay; Tamás Leiner; Máté Tuba; Szabolcs Ábrahám; Nelli Farkas; Péter Hegyi; Zsolt Molnár
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-30

4.  Continuous hemodynamic monitoring during laparoscopic gastric bypass in superobese patients by pressure recording analytical method.

Authors:  Tania Balderi; Francesco Forfori; Valeria Marra; Claudio Di Salvo; Massimo Dorigo; Marco Anselmino; Salvatore Mario Romano; Francesco Giunta
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Acute cholecystitis: video-laparoscopic versus traditional treatment.

Authors:  P C Amaral; E M Azaro Filho; M P Galvão-Neto; M F Fortes; E L Souza; R S Alcântra; J E Ettinger; A B Regis; M M Sousa; V M do Carmo; P A Santana; E Fahel
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Acute cholecystitis and severe ischemic cardiac disease: is laparoscopy indicated?

Authors:  Jihad R Salameh; Morris E Franklin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a cardiac transplant candidate with an ejection fraction of less than 15%.

Authors:  P E Jones; S C Sayson; D C Koehler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.