Literature DB >> 7839161

Laparoscopic plication of perforated ulcer: results of a selective approach.

A R Thompson1, T J Hall, B A Anglin, C E Scott-Conner.   

Abstract

We reviewed our experience with laparoscopy for perforated ulcer from April 1, 1992, to March 31, 1993. All patients admitted to the gastrointestinal surgery service with a diagnosis of perforated viscus had evaluation for possible laparoscopic Graham plication (LGP). Of eight patients considered, five had successful diagnostic laparoscopy. Two patients with anterior duodenal ulcers had LGP. Operative times were 85 and 106 minutes; postoperative stays were 5 and 8 days. Three procedures were converted to formal laparotomy when laparoscopy revealed gastric or prepyloric ulcers. Three patients had immediate laparotomy because of known disease process. Two additional patients were treated with open plication by other surgeons; their operative times were 98 and 110 minutes and postoperative stays, 6 and 4 days. Hospital charges averaged $6,573 for the two laparoscopic plications, $7,511 for the four plications not done laparoscopically, and $20,995 for the two cases converted to open plication. A selective approach allowed two Graham patch closures to be done laparoscopically without complications, at a cost comparable to that of open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7839161     DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199502000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the simple "one-stitch" suture with omental patch technique.

Authors:  Kyo-Young Song; Taeg-Hyun Kim; Seung-Nam Kim; Cho-Hyun Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Conversion of laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer: a single-center study.

Authors:  Markus Zimmermann; Martin Hoffmann; Tilman Laubert; Carlo Jung; Hans-Peter Bruch; Erik Schloericke
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Gastrotomy closure using bioabsorbable plugs in a canine model.

Authors:  Theodore J Cios; Kevin M Reavis; David R Renton; Jeffrey W Hazey; Dean J Mikami; Vimal K Narula; Matthew T Allemang; S Scott Davis; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer in two patients.

Authors:  A Kabashima; Y Maehara; M Hashizume; M Tomoda; Y Kakeji; S Ohno; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  Sandhya Lagoo; Ross L McMahon; Minoru Kakihara; Theodore N Pappas; Steve Eubanks
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.